{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E","short_pith_number":"pith:P6VDISDB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7faa344861f2f91ec7b962343b225af106545682627531068202fce8e2ed4cb5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2202.02389","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The impact of feature importance methods on the interpretation of defect classifiers","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.SE"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ahmed E. Hassan, Gopi Krishnan Rajbahadur, Shaowei Wang, Yasutaka Kamei","submitted_at":"2022-02-04T21:00:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Classifier specific (CS) and classifier agnostic (CA) feature importance methods are widely used (often interchangeably) by prior studies to derive feature importance ranks from a defect classifier. However, different feature importance methods are likely to compute different feature importance ranks even for the same dataset and classifier. Hence such interchangeable use of feature importance methods can lead to conclusion instabilities unless there is a strong agreement among different methods. Therefore, in this paper, we evaluate the agreement between the feature importance ranks associate"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2202.02389","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-02-04T21:00:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.SE"],"title_canon_sha256":"01a271ed39b4cac6d0b2813840464afbfab862f5430b3eff3992622f40fd9d0a","abstract_canon_sha256":"2439ed7d0509f2c7f20e3443f70025e30563e33d16092c68b4c1c210e7bf40a5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.382018Z","signature_b64":"7A1+rVve7d32u5Nrk6sjxTQkRnZ5vlT8N7YZls+LPadF928e8QUuawb/xBSqk6UnwKv4bApte8BVuMLfl9UzCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7faa344861f2f91ec7b962343b225af106545682627531068202fce8e2ed4cb5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381650Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381650Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The impact of feature importance methods on the interpretation of defect classifiers","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.SE"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ahmed E. Hassan, Gopi Krishnan Rajbahadur, Shaowei Wang, Yasutaka Kamei","submitted_at":"2022-02-04T21:00:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Classifier specific (CS) and classifier agnostic (CA) feature importance methods are widely used (often interchangeably) by prior studies to derive feature importance ranks from a defect classifier. However, different feature importance methods are likely to compute different feature importance ranks even for the same dataset and classifier. Hence such interchangeable use of feature importance methods can lead to conclusion instabilities unless there is a strong agreement among different methods. Therefore, in this paper, we evaluate the agreement between the feature importance ranks associate"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2202.02389","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2202.02389/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2202.02389","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381706+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2202.02389v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381706+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2202.02389","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381706+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"P6VDISDB6L4R","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381706+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"P6VDISDB6L4R5R5Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381706+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"P6VDISDB","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381706+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.07153","citing_title":"Feature Importance Depends on Properties of the Data: Towards Choosing the Correct Explanations for Your Data and Decision Trees based Models","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E","json":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P6VDISDB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P6VDISDB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2202.02389&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/P6VDISDB6L4R5R5ZMI2DWIS26E/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381706+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:54:28.381706+00:00"}