{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5","short_pith_number":"pith:P7EACIVA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7fc80122a021366dfcf1b331f1150d8760c3cabd992a7788e5ae17f89131f856","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.21065","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"David Demeter, Dong Shu, Haoran Zhao, Mengnan Du, Xukun Liu, Yongfeng Zhang","submitted_at":"2024-07-27T21:51:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the rapidly evolving field of legal analytics, finding relevant cases and accurately predicting judicial outcomes are challenging because of the complexity of legal language, which often includes specialized terminology, complex syntax, and historical context. Moreover, the subtle distinctions between similar and precedent cases require a deep understanding of legal knowledge. Researchers often conflate these concepts, making it difficult to develop specialized techniques to effectively address these nuanced tasks. In this paper, we introduce the Law Large Language Model (LawLLM), a multi-t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.21065","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-07-27T21:51:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.IR","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"647b3798cc867483fab304798c398b7bcfac3b1174a33e2768e0c3b4da4ef32a","abstract_canon_sha256":"618f22a58bac01ef012ec310f878e7623ca8389106031b851eff484efdfd9923"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.487375Z","signature_b64":"+gb0e2k7iYv8AWIEcmY7V8sRcCrNpNxySCj+di7DPzMKlenooHIVxGnDYnGyAngssIApMF6LJd5t+GfaGA4JBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7fc80122a021366dfcf1b331f1150d8760c3cabd992a7788e5ae17f89131f856","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486941Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486941Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"David Demeter, Dong Shu, Haoran Zhao, Mengnan Du, Xukun Liu, Yongfeng Zhang","submitted_at":"2024-07-27T21:51:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the rapidly evolving field of legal analytics, finding relevant cases and accurately predicting judicial outcomes are challenging because of the complexity of legal language, which often includes specialized terminology, complex syntax, and historical context. Moreover, the subtle distinctions between similar and precedent cases require a deep understanding of legal knowledge. Researchers often conflate these concepts, making it difficult to develop specialized techniques to effectively address these nuanced tasks. In this paper, we introduce the Law Large Language Model (LawLLM), a multi-t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.21065","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.21065/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.21065","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.21065v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.21065","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"P7EACIVAEE3G","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"P7EACIVAEE3G37HR","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"P7EACIVA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486997+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.15110","citing_title":"LLMs and Agentic AI in Insurance Decision-Making: Opportunities and Challenges For Africa","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P7EACIVA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P7EACIVA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.21065&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/P7EACIVAEE3G37HRWMY7CFINQ5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486997+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:33.486997+00:00"}