{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP","short_pith_number":"pith:PAEFZHOG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"78085c9dc66e9e447faebc93d38eb22be1a43ce079801db3cc4bf27b57688826","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.14983","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Code Change Intention, Development Artifact and History Vulnerability: Putting Them Together for Vulnerability Fix Detection by LLM","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Jiayuan Zhou, Kui Liu, Michael Pacheco, Shaowei Wang, Wenhan Zhu, Xing Hu, Xu Yang","submitted_at":"2025-01-24T23:40:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Detecting vulnerability fix commits in open-source software is crucial for maintaining software security. To help OSS identify vulnerability fix commits, several automated approaches are developed. However, existing approaches like VulFixMiner and CoLeFunDa, focus solely on code changes, neglecting essential context from development artifacts. Tools like Vulcurator, which integrates issue reports, fail to leverage semantic associations between different development artifacts (e.g., pull requests and history vulnerability fixes). Moreover, they miss vulnerability fixes in tangled commits and la"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.14983","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-01-24T23:40:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b68b981612085451de8980912aa9743f67147e9af038993d397ce8027dd1217f","abstract_canon_sha256":"c5cd4eca83e38a3cc1d65170b26eede9e119f96107f8839a9cb5d7fabc46dfe2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673791Z","signature_b64":"tuVEUCGjDUGZmqU6Ej8a/5iwMXx9JKy9+KKorjfKH0Ips067RVmApc52Nv+nJnuDCw/EOq0aMwu0t0E86U5rDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"78085c9dc66e9e447faebc93d38eb22be1a43ce079801db3cc4bf27b57688826","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673361Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673361Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Code Change Intention, Development Artifact and History Vulnerability: Putting Them Together for Vulnerability Fix Detection by LLM","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Jiayuan Zhou, Kui Liu, Michael Pacheco, Shaowei Wang, Wenhan Zhu, Xing Hu, Xu Yang","submitted_at":"2025-01-24T23:40:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Detecting vulnerability fix commits in open-source software is crucial for maintaining software security. To help OSS identify vulnerability fix commits, several automated approaches are developed. However, existing approaches like VulFixMiner and CoLeFunDa, focus solely on code changes, neglecting essential context from development artifacts. Tools like Vulcurator, which integrates issue reports, fail to leverage semantic associations between different development artifacts (e.g., pull requests and history vulnerability fixes). Moreover, they miss vulnerability fixes in tangled commits and la"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.14983","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.14983/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.14983","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.14983v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.14983","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PAEFZHOGN2PE","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PAEFZHOGN2PEI75O","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PAEFZHOG","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673424+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.13766","citing_title":"A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standards","ref_index":162,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PAEFZHOG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PAEFZHOG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.14983&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PAEFZHOGN2PEI75OXSJ5HDVSFP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673424+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:21.673424+00:00"}