{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV","short_pith_number":"pith:PDJR25T2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"78d31d767a3fcb84fd1f8c228bc685157ac5d7e494634a9e989374f59f6d41a2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.04681","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Sensitivity Analysis for Marginal Structural Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Edward Kennedy, Larry Wasserman, Matteo Bonvini, Valerie Ventura","submitted_at":"2022-10-10T13:31:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We introduce several methods for assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding in marginal structural models; importantly we allow treatments to be discrete or continuous, static or time-varying. We consider three sensitivity models: a propensity-based model, an outcome-based model, and a subset confounding model, in which only a fraction of the population is subject to unmeasured confounding. In each case we develop efficient estimators and confidence intervals for bounds on the causal parameters."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.04681","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2022-10-10T13:31:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"b31f0169991b3254e479605a3010062dcd5a167d055cbec9a93c32a7da6a97ca","abstract_canon_sha256":"43c7bfa425a02e795cd077779b0e5ece6736215a28e77ef10f09d86087741ecf"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704895Z","signature_b64":"uXL7xDX9ZlGOr/YMeox6pdsP4g43UGcm5xKKks3DzqkmKUPlyMEK6+lyN5HsTCdCa5jxA2jYRA02w/UGe7wfCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"78d31d767a3fcb84fd1f8c228bc685157ac5d7e494634a9e989374f59f6d41a2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704403Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704403Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Sensitivity Analysis for Marginal Structural Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Edward Kennedy, Larry Wasserman, Matteo Bonvini, Valerie Ventura","submitted_at":"2022-10-10T13:31:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We introduce several methods for assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding in marginal structural models; importantly we allow treatments to be discrete or continuous, static or time-varying. We consider three sensitivity models: a propensity-based model, an outcome-based model, and a subset confounding model, in which only a fraction of the population is subject to unmeasured confounding. In each case we develop efficient estimators and confidence intervals for bounds on the causal parameters."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.04681","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.04681/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.04681","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704463+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.04681v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704463+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.04681","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704463+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PDJR25T2H7FY","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704463+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704463+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PDJR25T2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704463+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01706","citing_title":"Higher-Order Debiased Estimators for General Treatment Models","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.13397","citing_title":"Assessing the robustness of heterogeneous treatment effects in survival analysis under informative censoring","ref_index":84,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PDJR25T2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PDJR25T2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.04681&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PDJR25T2H7FYJ7I7RQRIXRUFCV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704463+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:10.704463+00:00"}