{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M","short_pith_number":"pith:PGPBRL5S","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"799e18afb2f3929ab1eae6e5627acde314eb28bece1ac2195b69f2e9ef9ed5c8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1506.08126","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Humor in Collective Discourse: Unsupervised Funniness Detection in the New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.MM","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aasish Pappu, Agustin Chanfreau, Aikaterini Iliakopoulou, Alejandro Jaimes, Amanda Stent, Bob Mankoff, Dragomir Radev, Joel Tetreault, Jordi Vallmitjana, Paloma de Juan, Rahul Jha","submitted_at":"2015-06-26T15:48:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"The New Yorker publishes a weekly captionless cartoon. More than 5,000 readers submit captions for it. The editors select three of them and ask the readers to pick the funniest one. We describe an experiment that compares a dozen automatic methods for selecting the funniest caption. We show that negative sentiment, human-centeredness, and lexical centrality most strongly match the funniest captions, followed by positive sentiment. These results are useful for understanding humor and also in the design of more engaging conversational agents in text and multimodal (vision+text) systems. As part "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1506.08126","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2015-06-26T15:48:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.MM","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"255ee9fb938b516dc3f793b885b14c48f27033a462015141ccb1acf4d344ccf4","abstract_canon_sha256":"599f9241cea3c29b83f47a9cc113e83975ed4f3455e11be6673f0b9496360821"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:48.003672Z","signature_b64":"V3e6k3jS9/QbQl4L/hyWZIWnyVLK6HLkhbpJDOLxW1+rfrhQ/a6n+HpUnKcNiPTNOLIzTvSuCiF+FvVQFB6lDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"799e18afb2f3929ab1eae6e5627acde314eb28bece1ac2195b69f2e9ef9ed5c8","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:48.002959Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:48.002959Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Humor in Collective Discourse: Unsupervised Funniness Detection in the New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.MM","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aasish Pappu, Agustin Chanfreau, Aikaterini Iliakopoulou, Alejandro Jaimes, Amanda Stent, Bob Mankoff, Dragomir Radev, Joel Tetreault, Jordi Vallmitjana, Paloma de Juan, Rahul Jha","submitted_at":"2015-06-26T15:48:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"The New Yorker publishes a weekly captionless cartoon. More than 5,000 readers submit captions for it. The editors select three of them and ask the readers to pick the funniest one. We describe an experiment that compares a dozen automatic methods for selecting the funniest caption. We show that negative sentiment, human-centeredness, and lexical centrality most strongly match the funniest captions, followed by positive sentiment. These results are useful for understanding humor and also in the design of more engaging conversational agents in text and multimodal (vision+text) systems. As part "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1506.08126","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1506.08126","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:48.003051+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1506.08126v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:48.003051+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1506.08126","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:48.003051+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PGPBRL5S6OJJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PGPBRL5S","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2405.19088","citing_title":"Cracking the Code of Juxtaposition: Can AI Models Understand the Humorous Contradictions","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.23137","citing_title":"When 'YES' Meets 'BUT': Can Large Models Comprehend Contradictory Humor Through Comparative Reasoning?","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PGPBRL5S"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PGPBRL5S","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1506.08126&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PGPBRL5S6OJJVMPK43SWE6WN4M/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:48.003051+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:48.003051+00:00"}