{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ","short_pith_number":"pith:PH36O66O","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"79f7e77bce2fe66a764537b285b2edbc054c385e5c1b6ed9e087ad3a5ff09394","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2107.07086","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Independence weights for causal inference with continuous treatments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Guanhua Chen, Jared D. Huling, Noah Greifer","submitted_at":"2021-07-15T02:38:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Studying causal effects of continuous treatments is important for gaining a deeper understanding of many interventions, policies, or medications, yet researchers are often left with observational studies for doing so. In the observational setting, confounding is a barrier to the estimation of causal effects. Weighting approaches seek to control for confounding by reweighting samples so that confounders are comparable across different treatment values. Yet, for continuous treatments, weighting methods are highly sensitive to model misspecification. In this paper we elucidate the key property th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2107.07086","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2021-07-15T02:38:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a3518508d607274150191f278993f40d8e81cc6867643e6ac38c22281c8d6dd9","abstract_canon_sha256":"49706e0981e018a3d781408395c8ed0091d23a3d0673254bdf579d4ec91e1b95"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.410008Z","signature_b64":"TW+zkuwxO+D6zl6M6zP82hwpcoQMm0eVkGxySUDQ4tYbK5M3leeU3GOMhPIp8aNYj4A+qRjKazXChix9Egz2Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"79f7e77bce2fe66a764537b285b2edbc054c385e5c1b6ed9e087ad3a5ff09394","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409474Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409474Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Independence weights for causal inference with continuous treatments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Guanhua Chen, Jared D. Huling, Noah Greifer","submitted_at":"2021-07-15T02:38:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Studying causal effects of continuous treatments is important for gaining a deeper understanding of many interventions, policies, or medications, yet researchers are often left with observational studies for doing so. In the observational setting, confounding is a barrier to the estimation of causal effects. Weighting approaches seek to control for confounding by reweighting samples so that confounders are comparable across different treatment values. Yet, for continuous treatments, weighting methods are highly sensitive to model misspecification. In this paper we elucidate the key property th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2107.07086","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2107.07086/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2107.07086","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409532+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2107.07086v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409532+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2107.07086","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409532+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PH36O66OF7TG","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409532+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PH36O66OF7TGU5SF","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409532+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PH36O66O","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409532+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08018","citing_title":"BAMIFun: Bayesian Multiple Imputation for Functional Data","ref_index":196,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PH36O66O"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PH36O66O","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2107.07086&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PH36O66OF7TGU5SFG6ZILMXNXQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409532+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:20:33.409532+00:00"}