{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1996:PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE","short_pith_number":"pith:PH3VBDOY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"79f7508dd80444f4e80e66ae05e29819167979de5912df09cc4375276ce77055","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-th/9610032","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is the String Coupling Constant invariant under T-duality?","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Enrique Alvarez, MSU Moscow), Yuri Kubyshin (UAM Madrid;","submitted_at":"1996-10-07T09:49:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is well known that under T-duality the sigma model dilaton (which is normally thought to be related to the string coupling constant through the simple formula $\\kappa = exp <\\phi >$), undergoes an additive shift. On the other hand, Kugo and Zwiebach, using a simplified form of string field theory, claim that the string coupling constant does not change under the T-duality. Obviously, what seems to happen is that two different coupling constants, associated to different dilatons, are used. In this contribution we shall try to clarify this, and related issues."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-th/9610032","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"1996-10-07T09:49:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c48870efbb9145882a153d26a7c45da9e5a095ec00a1865dd85995309d54c1af","abstract_canon_sha256":"1c7c3f27db91b2af1bea622569f9a7867a440e4e02a9d0ddf8163ea328c0e94c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656480Z","signature_b64":"8K9njbU1e5JeqQtv/fDlfp7aS8FYGRScHpLbvJnjqHqk2NpeO3P0T5H9nPSnZb+Y0Fbe1SeF6FQMY5Ba85Q5Cg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"79f7508dd80444f4e80e66ae05e29819167979de5912df09cc4375276ce77055","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656060Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656060Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is the String Coupling Constant invariant under T-duality?","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Enrique Alvarez, MSU Moscow), Yuri Kubyshin (UAM Madrid;","submitted_at":"1996-10-07T09:49:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is well known that under T-duality the sigma model dilaton (which is normally thought to be related to the string coupling constant through the simple formula $\\kappa = exp <\\phi >$), undergoes an additive shift. On the other hand, Kugo and Zwiebach, using a simplified form of string field theory, claim that the string coupling constant does not change under the T-duality. Obviously, what seems to happen is that two different coupling constants, associated to different dilatons, are used. In this contribution we shall try to clarify this, and related issues."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-th/9610032","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-th/9610032/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-th/9610032","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-th/9610032v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9610032","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PH3VBDOYARCP","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AO","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PH3VBDOY","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656118+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1909.00411","citing_title":"More Stringy Effects in Target Space from Double Field Theory","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PH3VBDOY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PH3VBDOY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-th/9610032&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PH3VBDOYARCPJ2AOM2XALYUYDE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656118+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T16:02:23.656118+00:00"}