{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ","short_pith_number":"pith:PJCVZ22D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7a455ceb43cd30d97c9c0fca07a9a47e50d4c193b02ce39057d01915351475fe","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2302.09485","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A presentation of the torus-equivariant quantum $K$-theory ring of flag manifolds of type $A$, Part I: the defining ideal","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.AG","math.CO","math.KT","math.RT"],"primary_cat":"math.QA","authors_text":"Daisuke Sagaki, Satoshi Naito, Toshiaki Maeno","submitted_at":"2023-02-19T05:45:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We give a presentation of the torus-equivariant quantum $K$-theory ring of flag manifolds of type $A$, as a quotient of a polynomial ring by an explicit ideal. This is the torus-equivariant version of our previous result, which gives a presentation of the non-equivariant quantum $K$-theory ring of flag manifolds of type $A$. However, the method of proof for the torus-equivariant one is completely different from that for the non-equivariant one; our proof is based on the result in the $Q = 0$ limit, and uses Nakayama-type arguments to upgrade it to the quantum situation. Also, in contrast to th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2302.09485","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.QA","submitted_at":"2023-02-19T05:45:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.AG","math.CO","math.KT","math.RT"],"title_canon_sha256":"6acb5075d113eb830e113f12925ae5413a984969d1566e2ef21e8d2440524564","abstract_canon_sha256":"515bc87975430da379c7c990bc0d635019d67fafa5c4dff87496656d686ee823"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.752074Z","signature_b64":"IjD5bmyt9C89jd4suPYaRxpHSGeICrYfopx/gmzY/ADwFFfflQq4net24YMmmaIemrHm1nCj6rp7CGLMJ08GAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7a455ceb43cd30d97c9c0fca07a9a47e50d4c193b02ce39057d01915351475fe","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751656Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751656Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A presentation of the torus-equivariant quantum $K$-theory ring of flag manifolds of type $A$, Part I: the defining ideal","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.AG","math.CO","math.KT","math.RT"],"primary_cat":"math.QA","authors_text":"Daisuke Sagaki, Satoshi Naito, Toshiaki Maeno","submitted_at":"2023-02-19T05:45:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We give a presentation of the torus-equivariant quantum $K$-theory ring of flag manifolds of type $A$, as a quotient of a polynomial ring by an explicit ideal. This is the torus-equivariant version of our previous result, which gives a presentation of the non-equivariant quantum $K$-theory ring of flag manifolds of type $A$. However, the method of proof for the torus-equivariant one is completely different from that for the non-equivariant one; our proof is based on the result in the $Q = 0$ limit, and uses Nakayama-type arguments to upgrade it to the quantum situation. Also, in contrast to th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2302.09485","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2302.09485/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2302.09485","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751720+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2302.09485v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751720+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2302.09485","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751720+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PJCVZ22DZUYN","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751720+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751720+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PJCVZ22D","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751720+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.15261","citing_title":"On the Schubert calculus of the quantum K-theory for partial flag manifolds: a 3d A-model perspective","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PJCVZ22D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PJCVZ22D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2302.09485&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PJCVZ22DZUYNS7E4B7FAPKNEPZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751720+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:11:53.751720+00:00"}