{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E","short_pith_number":"pith:PKPOWRWR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7a9eeb46d124fe93ede32b0a7a5201d90de6020276f302e81a716b735dda487a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2003.01747","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Sense and Sensitivity Analysis: Simple Post-Hoc Analysis of Bias Due to Unobserved Confounding","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Anisha Zaveri, Victor Veitch","submitted_at":"2020-03-03T19:18:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is a truth universally acknowledged that an observed association without known mechanism must be in want of a causal estimate. However, causal estimation from observational data often relies on the (untestable) assumption of `no unobserved confounding'. Violations of this assumption can induce bias in effect estimates. In principle, such bias could invalidate or reverse the conclusions of a study. However, in some cases, we might hope that the influence of unobserved confounders is weak relative to a `large' estimated effect, so the qualitative conclusions are robust to bias from unobserved"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2003.01747","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2020-03-03T19:18:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"1fff75658a480cd02380bab126d6407158c4cf0d0e0149375c284857bcb9fb06","abstract_canon_sha256":"ec79f54bf3a561d3f768f857c5a9a5b8f258c6f5db08c260b4ad33db6e4abde3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426963Z","signature_b64":"4oso31vZua7H/bCAhuTkWZA08jPtGxvCrOfToXh9Q4FqGs0k57iH5rOPcQWTYM3DhqNAwB3b8GsFV/AUOVCUCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7a9eeb46d124fe93ede32b0a7a5201d90de6020276f302e81a716b735dda487a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426546Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426546Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Sense and Sensitivity Analysis: Simple Post-Hoc Analysis of Bias Due to Unobserved Confounding","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Anisha Zaveri, Victor Veitch","submitted_at":"2020-03-03T19:18:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is a truth universally acknowledged that an observed association without known mechanism must be in want of a causal estimate. However, causal estimation from observational data often relies on the (untestable) assumption of `no unobserved confounding'. Violations of this assumption can induce bias in effect estimates. In principle, such bias could invalidate or reverse the conclusions of a study. However, in some cases, we might hope that the influence of unobserved confounders is weak relative to a `large' estimated effect, so the qualitative conclusions are robust to bias from unobserved"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2003.01747","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2003.01747/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2003.01747","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426606+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2003.01747v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426606+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2003.01747","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426606+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PKPOWRWRET7J","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426606+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PKPOWRWRET7JH3PD","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426606+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PKPOWRWR","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426606+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.02928","citing_title":"Mitigating Hidden Confounding by Progressive Confounder Imputation via Large Language Models","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PKPOWRWR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PKPOWRWR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2003.01747&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PKPOWRWRET7JH3PDFMFHUUQB3E/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426606+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:58:08.426606+00:00"}