{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK","short_pith_number":"pith:PMZHJVL2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7b3274d57a2608164408716cb6ae0d32a7f30d5239ed4da3d28d4b0a32969d56","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.15800","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Statistical Significance of Feature Importance Rankings","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Giles Hooker, Jeremy Goldwasser","submitted_at":"2024-01-28T23:14:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Feature importance scores are ubiquitous tools for understanding the predictions of machine learning models. However, many popular attribution methods suffer from high instability due to random sampling. Leveraging novel ideas from hypothesis testing, we devise techniques that ensure the most important features are correct with high-probability guarantees. These assess the set of $K$ top-ranked features, as well as the order of its elements. Given a set of local or global importance scores, we demonstrate how to retrospectively verify the stability of the highest ranks. We then introduce two e"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.15800","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2024-01-28T23:14:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"4ede72fadd7c853cd8be40d630853a899ee8b0df0cf7cc4dd34a8a4a0ab51ef0","abstract_canon_sha256":"44ed0f661b050e132950afb673dca17e798c18e88bf03e714f804fa0f561e239"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783901Z","signature_b64":"7TM81ZiBaEDnYxdefbIIZzx4HZXiNwvk6f9hGtHaUjX7tePS0Mhu66TDZ2ZMbpqQg2KE2EaTv2bO+5G1G0snCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7b3274d57a2608164408716cb6ae0d32a7f30d5239ed4da3d28d4b0a32969d56","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783415Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783415Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Statistical Significance of Feature Importance Rankings","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Giles Hooker, Jeremy Goldwasser","submitted_at":"2024-01-28T23:14:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Feature importance scores are ubiquitous tools for understanding the predictions of machine learning models. However, many popular attribution methods suffer from high instability due to random sampling. Leveraging novel ideas from hypothesis testing, we devise techniques that ensure the most important features are correct with high-probability guarantees. These assess the set of $K$ top-ranked features, as well as the order of its elements. Given a set of local or global importance scores, we demonstrate how to retrospectively verify the stability of the highest ranks. We then introduce two e"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.15800","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.15800/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.15800","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.15800v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.15800","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PMZHJVL2EYEB","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PMZHJVL2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783472+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15154","citing_title":"RoSHAP: A Distributional Framework and Robust Metric for Stable Feature Attribution","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PMZHJVL2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PMZHJVL2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.15800&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PMZHJVL2EYEBMRAIOFWLNLQNGK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783472+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:37.783472+00:00"}