{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5","short_pith_number":"pith:POGVFO5D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7b8d52bba3b676259af312a4ddf33a3f45f2e90bc05e52772e62d3b089cd9501","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1809.04729","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Less Biased Evaluation of Out-of-distribution Sample Detectors","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CV","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Alireza Shafaei, James J. Little, Mark Schmidt","submitted_at":"2018-09-13T01:15:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the real world, a learning system could receive an input that is unlike anything it has seen during training. Unfortunately, out-of-distribution samples can lead to unpredictable behaviour. We need to know whether any given input belongs to the population distribution of the training/evaluation data to prevent unpredictable behaviour in deployed systems. A recent surge of interest in this problem has led to the development of sophisticated techniques in the deep learning literature. However, due to the absence of a standard problem definition or an exhaustive evaluation, it is not evident i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1809.04729","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2018-09-13T01:15:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CV","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"838a53e667b256fc1ae11c3774d687b5ba48c54b4c09f8006974a52484c33225","abstract_canon_sha256":"9e2614139aa941895e145470d271a8a96d2c1b211dc2f9eac4b73f6bab56c500"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866622Z","signature_b64":"R+M8WEm0/igDcKXdj7g5jeZUhXSFBEpqI3w0iX0JIYJWv3hKTfIuODOahFgCAcjkaZLfqUxDnwzkhZTsxIdPCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7b8d52bba3b676259af312a4ddf33a3f45f2e90bc05e52772e62d3b089cd9501","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866145Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866145Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Less Biased Evaluation of Out-of-distribution Sample Detectors","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CV","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Alireza Shafaei, James J. Little, Mark Schmidt","submitted_at":"2018-09-13T01:15:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the real world, a learning system could receive an input that is unlike anything it has seen during training. Unfortunately, out-of-distribution samples can lead to unpredictable behaviour. We need to know whether any given input belongs to the population distribution of the training/evaluation data to prevent unpredictable behaviour in deployed systems. A recent surge of interest in this problem has led to the development of sophisticated techniques in the deep learning literature. However, due to the absence of a standard problem definition or an exhaustive evaluation, it is not evident i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1809.04729","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1809.04729/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1809.04729","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1809.04729v2","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1809.04729","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"POGVFO5DWZ3C","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXT","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"POGVFO5D","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866201+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08639","citing_title":"VOLTA: The Surprising Ineffectiveness of Auxiliary Losses for Calibrated Deep Learning","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/POGVFO5D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/POGVFO5D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1809.04729&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/POGVFO5DWZ3CLGXTCKSN34Z2H5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866201+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T23:58:23.866201+00:00"}