{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU","short_pith_number":"pith:PPC7RF6D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7bc5f897c3f33c61af2908b594f689bd2b207585ff0e7de9498aedceee6c8249","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2002.11146","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-lat","nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Alexander F. Shaw, Jesse R. Stryker, Nathan Wiebe, Pavel Lougovski","submitted_at":"2020-02-25T19:18:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Schwinger model (quantum electrodynamics in 1+1 dimensions) is a testbed for the study of quantum gauge field theories. We give scalable, explicit digital quantum algorithms to simulate the lattice Schwinger model in both NISQ and fault-tolerant settings. In particular, we perform a tight analysis of low-order Trotter formula simulations of the Schwinger model, using recently derived commutator bounds, and give upper bounds on the resources needed for simulations in both scenarios. In lattice units, we find a Schwinger model on $N/2$ physical sites with coupling constant $x^{-1/2}$ and ele"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2002.11146","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2020-02-25T19:18:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-lat","nucl-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"1e0945599c042cdf9780bf56220a84ccf556dc6d628ce92fd000f4031e8ff979","abstract_canon_sha256":"b17b642dadf2725e5e0c3fe8ab752ca3715fd6bdb0376080a267352c056bdba7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873485Z","signature_b64":"FP66Gb5i8eRGtNERl/IDrvcxX1vEeYmsDhCwxhBTnhVYORbmc0XseSbHRT3czkGsFeDMTOWJHbM//DYOx+dPAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7bc5f897c3f33c61af2908b594f689bd2b207585ff0e7de9498aedceee6c8249","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873038Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873038Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-lat","nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Alexander F. Shaw, Jesse R. Stryker, Nathan Wiebe, Pavel Lougovski","submitted_at":"2020-02-25T19:18:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Schwinger model (quantum electrodynamics in 1+1 dimensions) is a testbed for the study of quantum gauge field theories. We give scalable, explicit digital quantum algorithms to simulate the lattice Schwinger model in both NISQ and fault-tolerant settings. In particular, we perform a tight analysis of low-order Trotter formula simulations of the Schwinger model, using recently derived commutator bounds, and give upper bounds on the resources needed for simulations in both scenarios. In lattice units, we find a Schwinger model on $N/2$ physical sites with coupling constant $x^{-1/2}$ and ele"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2002.11146","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2002.11146/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2002.11146","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873094+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2002.11146v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873094+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2002.11146","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873094+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PPC7RF6D6M6G","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873094+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873094+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PPC7RF6D","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873094+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26792","citing_title":"Fault-Tolerant Resource Comparison of Qudit and Qubit Encodings for Diagonal Quadratic Operators","ref_index":59,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20417","citing_title":"Quantum Simulation of Gauge Theories for Particle and Nuclear Physics","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.03586","citing_title":"Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories","ref_index":89,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26792","citing_title":"Fault-Tolerant Resource Comparison of Qudit and Qubit Encodings for Diagonal Quadratic Operators","ref_index":59,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PPC7RF6D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PPC7RF6D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2002.11146&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PPC7RF6D6M6GDLZJBC2ZJ5UJXU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873094+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:26:09.873094+00:00"}