{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3","short_pith_number":"pith:PTW4R2ZA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7cedc8eb20d7e8c291499face0b5dc1ecbccb3eba7c8e0502f3c2af43c3be0d5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1506.02169","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Gilles Louppe, Juan Pavez, Kyle Cranmer","submitted_at":"2015-06-06T16:59:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"In many fields of science, generalized likelihood ratio tests are established tools for statistical inference. At the same time, it has become increasingly common that a simulator (or generative model) is used to describe complex processes that tie parameters $\\theta$ of an underlying theory and measurement apparatus to high-dimensional observations $\\mathbf{x}\\in \\mathbb{R}^p$. However, simulator often do not provide a way to evaluate the likelihood function for a given observation $\\mathbf{x}$, which motivates a new class of likelihood-free inference algorithms. In this paper, we show that l"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1506.02169","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2015-06-06T16:59:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"936236e24c18e2253a59ffa363a55c8ad6901f0ff298d3ab29f4021e1ac8b1d5","abstract_canon_sha256":"45648e5ec612b2a84bba0d39710d283fc7c5749533a0a051e3e6f404439e22ba"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:18:54.344752Z","signature_b64":"LJtNfegRpfEbyQtJ3D8/m5Fwzm1SXCAQSYocnbjaP2Ds2pulX7fMuCP2yfsMlgID4zckHhIDPNcwmVrPxqXlCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7cedc8eb20d7e8c291499face0b5dc1ecbccb3eba7c8e0502f3c2af43c3be0d5","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:18:54.344061Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:18:54.344061Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Gilles Louppe, Juan Pavez, Kyle Cranmer","submitted_at":"2015-06-06T16:59:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"In many fields of science, generalized likelihood ratio tests are established tools for statistical inference. At the same time, it has become increasingly common that a simulator (or generative model) is used to describe complex processes that tie parameters $\\theta$ of an underlying theory and measurement apparatus to high-dimensional observations $\\mathbf{x}\\in \\mathbb{R}^p$. However, simulator often do not provide a way to evaluate the likelihood function for a given observation $\\mathbf{x}$, which motivates a new class of likelihood-free inference algorithms. In this paper, we show that l"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1506.02169","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1506.02169","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:18:54.344163+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1506.02169v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:18:54.344163+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1506.02169","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:18:54.344163+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PTW4R2ZA27UM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PTW4R2ZA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2305.10915","citing_title":"Optimizing The Cut And Count Method In Phenomenological Studies","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.02032","citing_title":"Neural simulation-based inference of the Higgs trilinear self-coupling via off-shell Higgs production","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.02219","citing_title":"Many Wrongs Make a Right: Leveraging Biased Simulations Towards Unbiased Parameter Inference","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21857","citing_title":"Odd Physics Off the Diagonal: Constraining CP-violating SMEFT with Quantum Tomography","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07438","citing_title":"LSST Strong Lensing Systems Dark Matter Sensitivity Analysis with Neural Ratio Estimators","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PTW4R2ZA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PTW4R2ZA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1506.02169&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PTW4R2ZA27UMFEKJT6WOBNO4D3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:18:54.344163+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:18:54.344163+00:00"}