{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS","short_pith_number":"pith:PV73RVH7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7d7fb8d4ff1bda64d54827bd6eda0a44ade890ab28a3773f0e4054102987cbc8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.18136","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A comparative computational study of different formulations of the compressible Euler equations for mesoscale atmospheric flows in a finite volume framework","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.ao-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.flu-dyn","authors_text":"Annalisa Quaini, Gianluigi Rozza, Michele Girfoglio","submitted_at":"2024-02-28T07:56:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider three conservative forms of the mildly compressible Euler equations, called CE1, CE2 and CE3, with the goal of understanding which leads to the most accurate and robust pressure-based solver in a finite volume environment. Forms CE1 and CE2 are both written in density, momentum, and specific enthalpy, but employ two different treatments of the buoyancy and pressure gradient terms: for CE1 it is the standard pressure splitting implemented in open-source finite volume solvers (e.g., OpenFOAM), while for CE2 it is the typical pressure splitting found in computational atmospheric studi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.18136","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.flu-dyn","submitted_at":"2024-02-28T07:56:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.ao-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"15db7d003bd6d52944a928fbfa50b123cbe7787135f5d1bd93746b36b271e95e","abstract_canon_sha256":"bb89954790af27c4db1208d0494072e3e89709b904f3ad1eff5b702e39da9366"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732748Z","signature_b64":"06WPTBqHX1lLWWrG4W7eHJ4RYQ6jMx2Vu6ybO7WT+bd461mCUM4zltX14NeVcvCLJfDRurL0X17idgw+UG8PBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7d7fb8d4ff1bda64d54827bd6eda0a44ade890ab28a3773f0e4054102987cbc8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732268Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732268Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A comparative computational study of different formulations of the compressible Euler equations for mesoscale atmospheric flows in a finite volume framework","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.ao-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.flu-dyn","authors_text":"Annalisa Quaini, Gianluigi Rozza, Michele Girfoglio","submitted_at":"2024-02-28T07:56:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider three conservative forms of the mildly compressible Euler equations, called CE1, CE2 and CE3, with the goal of understanding which leads to the most accurate and robust pressure-based solver in a finite volume environment. Forms CE1 and CE2 are both written in density, momentum, and specific enthalpy, but employ two different treatments of the buoyancy and pressure gradient terms: for CE1 it is the standard pressure splitting implemented in open-source finite volume solvers (e.g., OpenFOAM), while for CE2 it is the typical pressure splitting found in computational atmospheric studi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.18136","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.18136/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.18136","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732328+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.18136v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732328+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.18136","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732328+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PV73RVH7DPNG","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732328+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PV73RVH7DPNGJVKI","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732328+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PV73RVH7","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732328+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.08750","citing_title":"Optimal Transport-Based Displacement Interpolation with Data Augmentation for Reduced Order Modeling of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems","ref_index":59,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PV73RVH7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PV73RVH7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.18136&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PV73RVH7DPNGJVKIE66W5WQKIS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732328+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:50:12.732328+00:00"}