{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG","short_pith_number":"pith:PVRTUSVG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7d633a4aa61d3890b3c1ca02097eb371bbdb25cfd2eb1ada99b858b16856b729","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.11825","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Revealing Political Bias in LLMs through Structured Multi-Agent Debate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Aishwarya Bandaru, Baixu Chen, Ethan Law, Fabian Bindley, Nandini Chavda, Trevor Bluth","submitted_at":"2025-06-13T14:30:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate social behaviour, yet their political biases and interaction dynamics in debates remain underexplored. We investigate how LLM type and agent gender attributes influence political bias using a structured multi-agent debate framework, by engaging Neutral, Republican, and Democrat American LLM agents in debates on politically sensitive topics. We systematically vary the underlying LLMs, agent genders, and debate formats to examine how model provenance and agent personas influence political bias and attitudes throughout debates. We fin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.11825","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-06-13T14:30:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"42e46f2236b0ba200454a645c3dec9e728c7bcf108926c78938821e4e8af3258","abstract_canon_sha256":"28d025067e1b2cbe8bbc50600aeaf3b56b8839812974703de469fcc753876b54"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362497Z","signature_b64":"vTvjLIJI9bDz5K5QXOIxKrsL1kXV+Umyfk7zPBLjk+nlTfK3cWMwNYxLqcj3pgF1RsL6BU+kQ6YdRwHgHiG0BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7d633a4aa61d3890b3c1ca02097eb371bbdb25cfd2eb1ada99b858b16856b729","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362032Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362032Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Revealing Political Bias in LLMs through Structured Multi-Agent Debate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Aishwarya Bandaru, Baixu Chen, Ethan Law, Fabian Bindley, Nandini Chavda, Trevor Bluth","submitted_at":"2025-06-13T14:30:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate social behaviour, yet their political biases and interaction dynamics in debates remain underexplored. We investigate how LLM type and agent gender attributes influence political bias using a structured multi-agent debate framework, by engaging Neutral, Republican, and Democrat American LLM agents in debates on politically sensitive topics. We systematically vary the underlying LLMs, agent genders, and debate formats to examine how model provenance and agent personas influence political bias and attitudes throughout debates. We fin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.11825","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.11825/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.11825","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362090+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.11825v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362090+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.11825","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362090+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PVRTUSVGDU4J","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362090+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6B","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362090+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PVRTUSVG","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362090+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27228","citing_title":"When Roles Fail: Epistemic Constraints on Advocate Role Fidelity in LLM-Based Political Statement Analysis","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13103","citing_title":"Fairness in Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: An SDLC-Oriented Rapid Review","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PVRTUSVG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PVRTUSVG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.11825&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PVRTUSVGDU4JBM6BZIBAS7VTOG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362090+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:21:11.362090+00:00"}