{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1996:PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF","short_pith_number":"pith:PVXPBBKE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7d6ef08544ade3650c6d83ced6795f0144b759c5157b22b613fc66020b804adc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-th/9605150","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"F-theory and Orientifolds","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Ashoke Sen","submitted_at":"1996-05-22T03:31:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"By analyzing $F$-theory on $K3$ near the orbifold limit of $K3$ we establish the equivalence between $F$-theory on $K3$ and an orientifold of type IIB on $T^2$, which in turn, is related by a T-duality transformation to type I theory on $T^2$. By analyzing the $F$-theory background away from the orbifold limit, we show that non-perturbative effects in the orientifold theory splits an orientifold plane into two planes, with non-trivial SL(2,Z) monodromy around each of them. The mathematical description of this phenomenon is identical to the Seiberg-Witten result for N=2 supersymmetric $SU(2)$ g"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-th/9605150","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"1996-05-22T03:31:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c9f9dbb4f944055b5f9321759fccba37f7fb06c3149e81b4b303e03a7dab1b3e","abstract_canon_sha256":"4b1a0eeb00e2865a0427b643d6d0cf638dadf7139363cd1d2e2f97990aadf47d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088833Z","signature_b64":"r3M7IljHsz5pVL7mDTF6d4bm33Y5A0N0RpL4iWgkqSxuYeNzlLQfGsbYcAK3Y5MKpr2Ge05YpqPbZwv018AvBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7d6ef08544ade3650c6d83ced6795f0144b759c5157b22b613fc66020b804adc","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088496Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088496Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"F-theory and Orientifolds","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Ashoke Sen","submitted_at":"1996-05-22T03:31:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"By analyzing $F$-theory on $K3$ near the orbifold limit of $K3$ we establish the equivalence between $F$-theory on $K3$ and an orientifold of type IIB on $T^2$, which in turn, is related by a T-duality transformation to type I theory on $T^2$. By analyzing the $F$-theory background away from the orbifold limit, we show that non-perturbative effects in the orientifold theory splits an orientifold plane into two planes, with non-trivial SL(2,Z) monodromy around each of them. The mathematical description of this phenomenon is identical to the Seiberg-Witten result for N=2 supersymmetric $SU(2)$ g"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-th/9605150","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-th/9605150/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-th/9605150","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-th/9605150v2","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9605150","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PVXPBBKEVXRW","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDN","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PVXPBBKE","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088554+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19423","citing_title":"Calabi-Yau Orientifold Hypersurfaces and their F-theory Uplifts","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.06799","citing_title":"Three-Loop Gauge Beta Functions in Supersymmetric Theories with Exponential Higher Covariant Derivative Regularization","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.12315","citing_title":"Quantum obstructions for $N=1$ infinite distance limits -- Part I: $g_s$ obstructions","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19885","citing_title":"On non-relativistic integrable models and 4d SCFTs","ref_index":103,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PVXPBBKE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PVXPBBKE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-th/9605150&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PVXPBBKEVXRWKDDNQPHNM6K7AF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088554+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.088554+00:00"}