{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM","short_pith_number":"pith:PWPG3JDK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7d9e6da46a78e1807379a910e021df732cc276a2a44f73b1a1218f3a5d1f000c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1507.00244","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Expected Shortfall is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk - Implications for backtesting","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.ST"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.RM","authors_text":"Johanna F. Ziegel, Tilmann Gneiting, Tobias Fissler","submitted_at":"2015-07-01T14:24:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this note, we comment on the relevance of elicitability for backtesting risk measure estimates. In particular, we propose the use of Diebold-Mariano tests, and show how they can be implemented for Expected Shortfall (ES), based on the recent result of Fissler and Ziegel (2015) that ES is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1507.00244","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.RM","submitted_at":"2015-07-01T14:24:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-fin.ST"],"title_canon_sha256":"2a9065501a98170e86a4fe112e2f770625e11662b0ac0714584a5d499af9fa1e","abstract_canon_sha256":"596e0d2a84ec8140a3d8fb37e765ddda78e1372bcd776615b8e3f24c0e4504ff"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:09:36.610918Z","signature_b64":"7awrdu963K37FsVlOuzy2gPmCWheSibDWR7+NTLCaPcqSvddrHSij6nAo67/FIPDiiobF6jGLzPHCrhMbvu+BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7d9e6da46a78e1807379a910e021df732cc276a2a44f73b1a1218f3a5d1f000c","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:09:36.610498Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:09:36.610498Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Expected Shortfall is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk - Implications for backtesting","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.ST"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.RM","authors_text":"Johanna F. Ziegel, Tilmann Gneiting, Tobias Fissler","submitted_at":"2015-07-01T14:24:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this note, we comment on the relevance of elicitability for backtesting risk measure estimates. In particular, we propose the use of Diebold-Mariano tests, and show how they can be implemented for Expected Shortfall (ES), based on the recent result of Fissler and Ziegel (2015) that ES is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1507.00244","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1507.00244","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:09:36.610559+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1507.00244v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:09:36.610559+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1507.00244","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:09:36.610559+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PWPG3JDKPDQY","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PWPG3JDKPDQYA43Z","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PWPG3JDK","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19580","citing_title":"Probabilistic Forecasting for Day-ahead Electricity Prices, Battery Trading Strategies and the Economic Evaluation of Predictive Accuracy","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PWPG3JDK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PWPG3JDK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1507.00244&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PWPG3JDKPDQYA43ZVEIOAIO7OM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:09:36.610559+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:09:36.610559+00:00"}