{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T","short_pith_number":"pith:PWYTLTYL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7db135cf0b7de9ed6cd27c12555116dcee70b4c94db024a2cb05d9513a816738","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.08206","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Sources of Gain: Decomposing Performance in Conditional Average Dose Response Estimation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Christopher Bockel-Rickermann, Tim Verdonck, Toon Vanderschueren, Wouter Verbeke","submitted_at":"2024-06-12T13:39:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Estimating conditional average dose responses (CADR) is an important but challenging problem. Estimators must correctly model the potentially complex relationships between covariates, interventions, doses, and outcomes. In recent years, the machine learning community has shown great interest in developing tailored CADR estimators that target specific challenges. Their performance is typically evaluated against other methods on (semi-) synthetic benchmark datasets. Our paper analyses this practice and shows that using popular benchmark datasets without further analysis is insufficient to judge "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.08206","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-06-12T13:39:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0e8f8f0ab2b1d0f5216c082ed1a9b4c99897ba69dcdc115b444067337528c07f","abstract_canon_sha256":"fc67b59bf8b0bf8694bcabade0f24b3466405f8062cfc02cc1e5dcfc9c69a0c0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663790Z","signature_b64":"Ae91Xztcd93vSK8lWPEPazUHrRuZ7DOCuq3i7VxzXPAmqZWIAB6jcjs+FPK2KqF461baTEaiZ8Bq7qwbkGPgAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7db135cf0b7de9ed6cd27c12555116dcee70b4c94db024a2cb05d9513a816738","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663338Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663338Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Sources of Gain: Decomposing Performance in Conditional Average Dose Response Estimation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Christopher Bockel-Rickermann, Tim Verdonck, Toon Vanderschueren, Wouter Verbeke","submitted_at":"2024-06-12T13:39:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Estimating conditional average dose responses (CADR) is an important but challenging problem. Estimators must correctly model the potentially complex relationships between covariates, interventions, doses, and outcomes. In recent years, the machine learning community has shown great interest in developing tailored CADR estimators that target specific challenges. Their performance is typically evaluated against other methods on (semi-) synthetic benchmark datasets. Our paper analyses this practice and shows that using popular benchmark datasets without further analysis is insufficient to judge "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.08206","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.08206/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.08206","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.08206v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.08206","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PWYTLTYLPXU6","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PWYTLTYLPXU623GS","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663401+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PWYTLTYL","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663401+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.09232","citing_title":"Uplift modeling with continuous treatments: A predict-then-optimize approach","ref_index":2024,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PWYTLTYL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PWYTLTYL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.08206&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PWYTLTYLPXU623GSPQJFKUIW3T/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663401+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:56.663401+00:00"}