{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN","short_pith_number":"pith:PX7JLNVP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7dfe95b6af9cf108fa3e006b01eff5c37758580807721171ecc0039d29119620","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2508.03366","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Comparative Study of Neurosymbolic AI Approaches to Interpretable Logical Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG","cs.SC"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Michael K. Chen","submitted_at":"2025-08-05T12:14:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"General logical reasoning, defined as the ability to reason deductively on domain-agnostic tasks, continues to be a challenge for large language models (LLMs). Current LLMs fail to reason deterministically and are not interpretable. As such, there has been a recent surge in interest in neurosymbolic AI, which attempts to incorporate logic into neural networks. We first identify two main neurosymbolic approaches to improving logical reasoning: (i) the integrative approach comprising models where symbolic reasoning is contained within the neural network, and (ii) the hybrid approach comprising m"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2508.03366","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-08-05T12:14:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.LG","cs.SC"],"title_canon_sha256":"ddda4baee85a180bd4c25f6f7adce2a3a91d21b28009bb34a93321e38c0cf49a","abstract_canon_sha256":"28446deba6b4bf029fd36f0655b636b59fc47f0326358ada8661a85b9eaa7179"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163510Z","signature_b64":"KjDOR7q0jyp9YFgNZBLRra+x915RMan0t1jC4Yrn66rnb7KboWZfRzXmiTKgiXTov+FtbV6FPo8IO6D2/be0Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7dfe95b6af9cf108fa3e006b01eff5c37758580807721171ecc0039d29119620","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163091Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163091Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Comparative Study of Neurosymbolic AI Approaches to Interpretable Logical Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG","cs.SC"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Michael K. Chen","submitted_at":"2025-08-05T12:14:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"General logical reasoning, defined as the ability to reason deductively on domain-agnostic tasks, continues to be a challenge for large language models (LLMs). Current LLMs fail to reason deterministically and are not interpretable. As such, there has been a recent surge in interest in neurosymbolic AI, which attempts to incorporate logic into neural networks. We first identify two main neurosymbolic approaches to improving logical reasoning: (i) the integrative approach comprising models where symbolic reasoning is contained within the neural network, and (ii) the hybrid approach comprising m"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2508.03366","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2508.03366/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2508.03366","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163143+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2508.03366v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163143+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2508.03366","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163143+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PX7JLNVPTTYQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163143+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163143+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PX7JLNVP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163143+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01797","citing_title":"Neural Decision-Propagation for Answer Set Programming","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PX7JLNVP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PX7JLNVP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2508.03366&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PX7JLNVPTTYQR6R6ABVQD37VYN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163143+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:55.163143+00:00"}