{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4","short_pith_number":"pith:PXJBRX25","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7dd218df5d32eb66b21920bd2048d0b70fe79419994324a2845fa1ff2702da23","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.13701","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidence","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Eunsol Choi, Hung-Ting Chen, Michael J.Q. Zhang","submitted_at":"2022-10-25T01:46:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Question answering models can use rich knowledge sources -- up to one hundred retrieved passages and parametric knowledge in the large-scale language model (LM). Prior work assumes information in such knowledge sources is consistent with each other, paying little attention to how models blend information stored in their LM parameters with that from retrieved evidence documents. In this paper, we simulate knowledge conflicts (i.e., where parametric knowledge suggests one answer and different passages suggest different answers) and examine model behaviors. We find retrieval performance heavily i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.13701","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-10-25T01:46:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3461f2d1aa7dbc9ebbe0a245f4b7f55eab072ce6a1ac9eaf2dfaf2dce571cb9d","abstract_canon_sha256":"ac497874d1f37fb8d8cfd2eb95503c0bd11689d9b944c847d1138aa1599dc2a1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175856Z","signature_b64":"BqY0Ura5Zn7J4QMxLym+YaWdC49st2COKOHEDtnc3NmDQAqtFNxOoQ08/FVJkYPEhzOuZbkEeoPIWjK4T4oWDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7dd218df5d32eb66b21920bd2048d0b70fe79419994324a2845fa1ff2702da23","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175387Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175387Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidence","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Eunsol Choi, Hung-Ting Chen, Michael J.Q. Zhang","submitted_at":"2022-10-25T01:46:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Question answering models can use rich knowledge sources -- up to one hundred retrieved passages and parametric knowledge in the large-scale language model (LM). Prior work assumes information in such knowledge sources is consistent with each other, paying little attention to how models blend information stored in their LM parameters with that from retrieved evidence documents. In this paper, we simulate knowledge conflicts (i.e., where parametric knowledge suggests one answer and different passages suggest different answers) and examine model behaviors. We find retrieval performance heavily i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.13701","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.13701/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.13701","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175444+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.13701v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175444+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.13701","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175444+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PXJBRX25GLVW","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175444+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175444+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PXJBRX25","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175444+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01923","citing_title":"Resonant Context Anchoring: Decoupling Attention Routing and Signal Gain at Inference Time","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2410.20791","citing_title":"From Cool Demos to Production-Ready FMware: Core Challenges and a Technology Roadmap","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.09174","citing_title":"Facet-Level Tracing of Evidence Uncertainty and Hallucination in RAG","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.00309","citing_title":"Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.09174","citing_title":"Facet-Level Tracing of Evidence Uncertainty and Hallucination in RAG","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PXJBRX25"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PXJBRX25","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.13701&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PXJBRX25GLVWNMQZEC6SASGQW4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175444+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:21.175444+00:00"}