{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ","short_pith_number":"pith:PYNFIMCH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7e1a54304766f24f0d29b253c57101be70302222a266e3940c2c8cdb68f4fe63","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2308.04371","version":10},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Andrew Chi-Chih Yao, Jingqin Yang, Yang Yuan, Yifan Zhang","submitted_at":"2023-08-08T16:18:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress, yet their ability to solve complex problems remains limited. In this work, we introduce Cumulative Reasoning (CR), a structured framework that enhances LLM problem-solving by emulating human-like iterative and cumulative thought processes. CR orchestrates LLMs in three distinct roles: Proposer, Verifier(s), and Reporter, to systematically decompose tasks, generate and validate intermediate reasoning steps, and compose them into a solution by building a dynamic Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) of verified propositio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2308.04371","kind":"arxiv","version":10},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2023-08-08T16:18:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0ad35dddee0c02a3977bebe15477119e7b3a945e8828bb6656090171b19845d6","abstract_canon_sha256":"5ad1ec09d6631905cc4399bf74fb10e388be3dff2f3df5adf08dfeae1197a829"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:01.849074Z","signature_b64":"JKw4NHsiq9bE+HH9j+P+/ndMnXXNw8koIv9tEBfRA+RPt+WGb2qZp9iqmJ456Q+htFoB6PaW/OfTpur/J10XCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7e1a54304766f24f0d29b253c57101be70302222a266e3940c2c8cdb68f4fe63","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:01.848278Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:01.848278Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Andrew Chi-Chih Yao, Jingqin Yang, Yang Yuan, Yifan Zhang","submitted_at":"2023-08-08T16:18:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress, yet their ability to solve complex problems remains limited. In this work, we introduce Cumulative Reasoning (CR), a structured framework that enhances LLM problem-solving by emulating human-like iterative and cumulative thought processes. CR orchestrates LLMs in three distinct roles: Proposer, Verifier(s), and Reporter, to systematically decompose tasks, generate and validate intermediate reasoning steps, and compose them into a solution by building a dynamic Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) of verified propositio"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2308.04371","kind":"arxiv","version":10},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2308.04371","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:01.848438+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2308.04371v10","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:01.848438+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2308.04371","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:01.848438+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PYNFIMCHM3ZE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PYNFIMCH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":8,"internal_anchor_count":8,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2409.10038","citing_title":"On the Diagram of Thought","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.10615","citing_title":"R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2312.08935","citing_title":"Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations","ref_index":94,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.06322","citing_title":"Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs","ref_index":152,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.02939","citing_title":"From Static Analysis to Audience Dissemination: A Training-Free Multimodal Controversy Detection Multi-Agent Framework","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21327","citing_title":"Understanding and Mitigating Spurious Signal Amplification in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Math Reasoning","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04066","citing_title":"Adapt to Thrive! Adaptive Power-Mean Policy Optimization for Improved LLM Reasoning","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04065","citing_title":"Free Energy-Driven Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Advantage Shaping for Unsupervised Reasoning in LLMs","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PYNFIMCH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PYNFIMCH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2308.04371&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PYNFIMCHM3ZE6DJJWJJ4K4IBXZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:01.848438+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:01.848438+00:00"}