{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4","short_pith_number":"pith:PZR7FB4F","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7e63f28785314feb5eda82deafd39c2f0abbfa984916d0251b5043c3706f37be","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2601.10758","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Agents at Risk: How Users Unwittingly Undermine LLM Safety","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Carsten Rudolph, Fengchao Chen, Tingmin Wu, Van Nguyen","submitted_at":"2026-01-14T03:29:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed in applications, such as trip-planning agents and web-use agents, to perform complex planning and execution tasks. Prior work has shown that LLM-based agents are vulnerable to context confusion, where external adversarial content incorporated into the agent's reasoning context may be treated as task-relevant constraints. However, external malicious content can enter the agent context via channels beyond retrieval. In this work, we introduce the User-Relayed Context Manipulation (UReCoM) attack, in which attackers manipulate beni"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2601.10758","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-01-14T03:29:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b954140db76f050dd219b1a16d52da349cd09f436235c556ce4d75f11832b616","abstract_canon_sha256":"0916ab16e7f43761baebf660c07e21ff261c8711dff69398cdfff49f5e267df1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.170107Z","signature_b64":"PdgPmM6nE7uzrgYtlZ05aqOEDxs3yrz2ABqTSg+wRf1AjZiMzwJcjcp5ijfjV3G2Frz3GVEOSWBUmG6rmUjuDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7e63f28785314feb5eda82deafd39c2f0abbfa984916d0251b5043c3706f37be","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169248Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169248Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Agents at Risk: How Users Unwittingly Undermine LLM Safety","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Carsten Rudolph, Fengchao Chen, Tingmin Wu, Van Nguyen","submitted_at":"2026-01-14T03:29:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed in applications, such as trip-planning agents and web-use agents, to perform complex planning and execution tasks. Prior work has shown that LLM-based agents are vulnerable to context confusion, where external adversarial content incorporated into the agent's reasoning context may be treated as task-relevant constraints. However, external malicious content can enter the agent context via channels beyond retrieval. In this work, we introduce the User-Relayed Context Manipulation (UReCoM) attack, in which attackers manipulate beni"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2601.10758","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2601.10758/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2601.10758","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169359+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2601.10758v2","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169359+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2601.10758","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169359+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PZR7FB4FGFH6","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169359+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169359+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PZR7FB4F","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169359+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10749","citing_title":"Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PZR7FB4F"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PZR7FB4F","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2601.10758&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PZR7FB4FGFH6WXW2QLPK7U44F4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169359+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-07T02:19:45.169359+00:00"}