{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U","short_pith_number":"pith:Q2REKIMO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"86a245218ec152544abbba18c799d5fd1c6f409f083614072944c846db063b64","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2106.09534","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Adversarial Visual Robustness by Causal Intervention","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Hanwang Zhang, Kaihua Tang, Mingyuan Tao","submitted_at":"2021-06-17T14:23:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Adversarial training is the de facto most promising defense against adversarial examples. Yet, its passive nature inevitably prevents it from being immune to unknown attackers. To achieve a proactive defense, we need a more fundamental understanding of adversarial examples, beyond the popular bounded threat model. In this paper, we provide a causal viewpoint of adversarial vulnerability: the cause is the spurious correlation ubiquitously existing in learning, i.e., the confounding effect, where attackers are precisely exploiting these effects. Therefore, a fundamental solution for adversarial "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2106.09534","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2021-06-17T14:23:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"f3e40b2f7d3a78f18db87c3867164eeeef50abadca2c89cbb0b8a95295082e67","abstract_canon_sha256":"656d9ab7008785ce90525ad74483a2ac7c2827a3dbce7dbce7234ca3b269acab"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295638Z","signature_b64":"JwKnQKkFFu5P0Rn36RzJC1jrk3acbFCoYj+Ux/ap15/oEea1NTxgQ9S8FOgl3AYnEhgOKRS5nyvx3wJHt5UuCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"86a245218ec152544abbba18c799d5fd1c6f409f083614072944c846db063b64","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295160Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295160Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Adversarial Visual Robustness by Causal Intervention","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Hanwang Zhang, Kaihua Tang, Mingyuan Tao","submitted_at":"2021-06-17T14:23:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Adversarial training is the de facto most promising defense against adversarial examples. Yet, its passive nature inevitably prevents it from being immune to unknown attackers. To achieve a proactive defense, we need a more fundamental understanding of adversarial examples, beyond the popular bounded threat model. In this paper, we provide a causal viewpoint of adversarial vulnerability: the cause is the spurious correlation ubiquitously existing in learning, i.e., the confounding effect, where attackers are precisely exploiting these effects. Therefore, a fundamental solution for adversarial "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2106.09534","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2106.09534/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2106.09534","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2106.09534v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2106.09534","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Q2REKIMOYFJF","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Q2REKIMO","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295213+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16339","citing_title":"Preference Instability in Reward Models: Detection and Mitigation via Sparse Autoencoders","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q2REKIMO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q2REKIMO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2106.09534&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Q2REKIMOYFJFISV3XIMMPGOV7U/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295213+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:20:22.295213+00:00"}