{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB","short_pith_number":"pith:Q3XG4TBH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"86ee6e4c27edb68fa52ee8feea70bc385bec7544516cbef22a72a5b2cb94a1e7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1611.05302","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A composite likelihood ratio approach to the analysis of correlated binary data in genetic association studies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Lisa Strug, Zeynep Baskurt","submitted_at":"2016-11-16T15:00:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"The likelihood function represents statistical evidence in the context of data and a probability model. Considerable theory has demonstrated that evidence strength for different parameter values can be interpreted from the ratio of likelihoods at different points on the likelihood curve. The likelihood function can, however, be unknown or difficult to compute; e.g. for genetic association studies with a binary outcome in large multi-generational families. Composite likelihood is a convenient alternative to using the real likelihood and here we show composite likelihoods have valid evidential i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1611.05302","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2016-11-16T15:00:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"2fbdca246f38035b3cbeb6e8a9415c617d56c63cb6c0ff3ec60146fd875c0394","abstract_canon_sha256":"498d27f11d0ec6c0f31738c9a59c90b28b2d34492bb4df7b6f6612140da48706"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:27.387278Z","signature_b64":"28TwUUtlRNhFxpv3G4YFn2paUclHaztu64ZpFfjRFlYaDNBv/Y0yvP9a1Bf+z6zpOf/9C8KQfAWMVTlnRyxeDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"86ee6e4c27edb68fa52ee8feea70bc385bec7544516cbef22a72a5b2cb94a1e7","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:27.386667Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:27.386667Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A composite likelihood ratio approach to the analysis of correlated binary data in genetic association studies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Lisa Strug, Zeynep Baskurt","submitted_at":"2016-11-16T15:00:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"The likelihood function represents statistical evidence in the context of data and a probability model. Considerable theory has demonstrated that evidence strength for different parameter values can be interpreted from the ratio of likelihoods at different points on the likelihood curve. The likelihood function can, however, be unknown or difficult to compute; e.g. for genetic association studies with a binary outcome in large multi-generational families. Composite likelihood is a convenient alternative to using the real likelihood and here we show composite likelihoods have valid evidential i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1611.05302","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1611.05302","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:27.386749+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1611.05302v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:27.386749+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1611.05302","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:27.386749+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Q3XG4TBH5W3I","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:39.010887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:39.010887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Q3XG4TBH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:39.010887+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q3XG4TBH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q3XG4TBH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1611.05302&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3XG4TBH5W3I7JJO5D7OU4F4HB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:27.386749+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:27.386749+00:00"}