{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6","short_pith_number":"pith:Q3ZT6MT2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"86f33f327a9a914567f83a1c19825e1fb56c287deb6070bf5cb974406a0990f4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.09497","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Use of Readability Metrics in Legal Text: A Systematic Literature Review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aaron Ceross, Jeroen H.M. Bergmann, Yu Han","submitted_at":"2024-11-14T15:04:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding the text in legal documents can be challenging due to their complex structure and the inclusion of domain-specific jargon. Laws and regulations are often crafted in such a manner that engagement with them requires formal training, potentially leading to vastly different interpretations of the same texts. Linguistic complexity is an important contributor to the difficulties experienced by readers. Simplifying texts could enhance comprehension across a broader audience, not just among trained professionals. Various metrics have been developed to measure document readability. Theref"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.09497","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-11-14T15:04:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"80d5efb99ff248ee861c9cfa737baf0bc20416eac786c6d478d88fb9f0db94e0","abstract_canon_sha256":"769531e8826259f341ebdc7618c02a6aa33fe77a2971a768271b7877e3eb4d00"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863839Z","signature_b64":"CL+MvdlQdv/Qyo1vTqihAGFrgkGJIkNKklUP2Vy056uOySiCqaUM/ZPZGiE+weIWyrJ8HDnbsZobpp7kCQNKDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"86f33f327a9a914567f83a1c19825e1fb56c287deb6070bf5cb974406a0990f4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863423Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863423Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Use of Readability Metrics in Legal Text: A Systematic Literature Review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aaron Ceross, Jeroen H.M. Bergmann, Yu Han","submitted_at":"2024-11-14T15:04:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding the text in legal documents can be challenging due to their complex structure and the inclusion of domain-specific jargon. Laws and regulations are often crafted in such a manner that engagement with them requires formal training, potentially leading to vastly different interpretations of the same texts. Linguistic complexity is an important contributor to the difficulties experienced by readers. Simplifying texts could enhance comprehension across a broader audience, not just among trained professionals. Various metrics have been developed to measure document readability. Theref"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.09497","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.09497/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.09497","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.09497v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.09497","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Q3ZT6MT2TKIU","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Q3ZT6MT2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863486+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.19221","citing_title":"Evaluating the Evaluators: Are readability metrics good measures of readability?","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q3ZT6MT2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q3ZT6MT2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.09497&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Q3ZT6MT2TKIUKZ7YHIOBTAS6D6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863486+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:35:27.863486+00:00"}