{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2","short_pith_number":"pith:Q57T22XM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"877f3d6aec196e9e26b8b8cfa9727876bb174d1fc5306b9fa1b234edbf53b865","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2603.00179","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Privacy-Preserving Proof of Human Authorship via Zero-Knowledge Process Attestation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Zero-knowledge proofs let verifiers confirm human authorship of writing without learning keystroke data, timings, or editing history.","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.IT","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"David Condrey","submitted_at":"2026-02-26T20:38:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"Process attestation verifies human authorship by collecting behavioral biometric evidence, including keystroke dynamics, typing patterns, and editing behavior, during the creative process. However, the very data needed to prove authenticity can reveal intimate details about an author's cognitive state, health conditions, and identity, constituting sensitive biometric data under GDPR Article 9. We resolve this privacy-attestation paradox using zero-knowledge proofs. We present ZK-PoP, a construction that allows a verifier to confirm that (a) sequential work function chains were computed correct"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2603.00179","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-02-26T20:38:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","cs.IT","math.IT"],"title_canon_sha256":"98b8857f2158d68d2eb389bc3aa727d60645d82c36fa6c3ea71c8122fc539364","abstract_canon_sha256":"21a6b310072730457d355a1ac92859a7a04a9ed4578c3b1fcf45be141788d6a8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.785134Z","signature_b64":"6iCWhLOWE/95J8aZLcxTBnoO7qUt10L3Zwdb/ypx5CEzIBkPphrYeUvQTgA/Og0dVKu0Y9ANk8Qjd065yRs8Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"877f3d6aec196e9e26b8b8cfa9727876bb174d1fc5306b9fa1b234edbf53b865","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784091Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784091Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Privacy-Preserving Proof of Human Authorship via Zero-Knowledge Process Attestation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Zero-knowledge proofs let verifiers confirm human authorship of writing without learning keystroke data, timings, or editing history.","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.IT","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"David Condrey","submitted_at":"2026-02-26T20:38:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"Process attestation verifies human authorship by collecting behavioral biometric evidence, including keystroke dynamics, typing patterns, and editing behavior, during the creative process. However, the very data needed to prove authenticity can reveal intimate details about an author's cognitive state, health conditions, and identity, constituting sensitive biometric data under GDPR Article 9. We resolve this privacy-attestation paradox using zero-knowledge proofs. We present ZK-PoP, a construction that allows a verifier to confirm that (a) sequential work function chains were computed correct"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We present ZK-PoP, a construction that allows a verifier to confirm that (a) sequential work function chains were computed correctly, (b) behavioral feature vectors fall within human population distributions, and (c) content evolution is consistent with incremental human editing, all without learning the underlying behavioral data, exact timing, or intermediate content.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"Behavioral biometric features can be encoded into arithmetic circuits such that range proofs and consistency checks remain both sound and sufficiently accurate when the underlying distributions are treated as public and fixed.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"ZK-PoP uses Groth16 proofs, Pedersen commitments, and Bulletproof range proofs to attest that behavioral feature vectors and content evolution match human patterns without exposing the raw data.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Zero-knowledge proofs let verifiers confirm human authorship of writing without learning keystroke data, timings, or editing history.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"4d0b7b81fa0da549b985628c300332526b36627e5bab495fd03f1937fa9367f0"},"source":{"id":"2603.00179","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":"b340de0d-b7d8-428e-93fe-3fd17338c875","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T18:23:31.018366Z","strongest_claim":"We present ZK-PoP, a construction that allows a verifier to confirm that (a) sequential work function chains were computed correctly, (b) behavioral feature vectors fall within human population distributions, and (c) content evolution is consistent with incremental human editing, all without learning the underlying behavioral data, exact timing, or intermediate content.","one_line_summary":"ZK-PoP uses Groth16 proofs, Pedersen commitments, and Bulletproof range proofs to attest that behavioral feature vectors and content evolution match human patterns without exposing the raw data.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"Behavioral biometric features can be encoded into arithmetic circuits such that range proofs and consistency checks remain both sound and sufficiently accurate when the underlying distributions are treated as public and fixed.","pith_extraction_headline":"Zero-knowledge proofs let verifiers confirm human authorship of writing without learning keystroke data, timings, or editing history."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2603.00179/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"c1c141b2dd4d6620f50a7d68fa01e1ffd4360604b7ab3bb7e5c8ee868bfc81f8"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.00179","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784249+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.00179v3","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784249+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.00179","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784249+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Q57T22XMDFXJ","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784249+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVY","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784249+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Q57T22XM","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784249+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q57T22XM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q57T22XM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2603.00179&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Q57T22XMDFXJ4JVYXDH2S4TYO2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784249+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.784249+00:00"}