{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26","short_pith_number":"pith:Q5AIFF2V","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8740829755cd21b29de9f3d9817b06d79824fd1c1552b62fd753ff3911c414f5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1904.08435","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Distributed sampling, quantum communication witnesses, and measurement incompatibility","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Leandro Aolita, Leonardo Guerini, Marco T\\'ulio Quintino","submitted_at":"2019-04-17T18:00:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study prepare-and-measure experiments where the sender (Alice) receives trusted quantum inputs but has an untrusted state-preparation device and the receiver (Bob) has a fully-untrusted measurement device. A distributed-sampling task naturally arises in such scenario, whose goal is for Alice and Bob to reproduce the statistics of his measurements on her quantum inputs using a fixed communication channel. Their performance at such task can certify quantum communication (QC), and this is formalised by measurement-device-independent QC witnesses. Furthermore, we prove that QC can provide an ad"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1904.08435","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2019-04-17T18:00:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"42c951d51ef03ef77d26f207ce6b1e76b89b196e5ece735ab5c25f7bdc23e54f","abstract_canon_sha256":"10a8bc6d23d75b78a4c9c29265bdb753cc2df85800fdb70396227df082905df7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756812Z","signature_b64":"AFAxtdEYMkNQ15+yEVWgth4l6u/CXbYTE4D2P4bGf6zWwyzjcLVT8M82ikcglZgLQrgUK9f0RwNj5rtbIt9OAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8740829755cd21b29de9f3d9817b06d79824fd1c1552b62fd753ff3911c414f5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756376Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756376Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Distributed sampling, quantum communication witnesses, and measurement incompatibility","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Leandro Aolita, Leonardo Guerini, Marco T\\'ulio Quintino","submitted_at":"2019-04-17T18:00:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study prepare-and-measure experiments where the sender (Alice) receives trusted quantum inputs but has an untrusted state-preparation device and the receiver (Bob) has a fully-untrusted measurement device. A distributed-sampling task naturally arises in such scenario, whose goal is for Alice and Bob to reproduce the statistics of his measurements on her quantum inputs using a fixed communication channel. Their performance at such task can certify quantum communication (QC), and this is formalised by measurement-device-independent QC witnesses. Furthermore, we prove that QC can provide an ad"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1904.08435","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1904.08435/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1904.08435","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756434+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1904.08435v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756434+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1904.08435","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756434+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Q5AIFF2VZUQ3","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756434+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756434+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Q5AIFF2V","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756434+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.21223","citing_title":"Strict hierarchy between $n$-wise measurement simulability, compatibility structures, and multi-copy compatibility","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q5AIFF2V"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q5AIFF2V","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1904.08435&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Q5AIFF2VZUQ3FHPJ6PMYC6YG26/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756434+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:11:46.756434+00:00"}