{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW","short_pith_number":"pith:Q7XXNA5K","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"87ef7683aa9439ef3f3d814160da137d8cd6d21b821e2e30a4d6d7de8555b2b9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1810.13379","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero","submitted_at":"2018-10-31T16:21:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Over the past decade, national research evaluation exercises, traditionally conducted using the peer review method, have begun opening to bibliometric indicators. The citations received by a publication are assumed as proxy for its quality, but they require standardization prior to use in comparative evaluation of organizations or individual scientists: the citation data must be standardized, due to the varying citation behavior across research fields. The objective of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of the different methods of normalizing citations, in order to provide useful indic"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1810.13379","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2018-10-31T16:21:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"67c732efe284e42f8815b9a98d32f8fb505080f84d1aef49cad45f7e59e3414c","abstract_canon_sha256":"c5362d29556ac54683ed841cb75838abb890853b3aac43e43215d779621d3973"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:49.486883Z","signature_b64":"7sue2c7BI3pJhqVniVw7TdRkToH63iQnC07NiK0U0vNDNPdniDttXrTiSSJHX3+haIaYRdk6rtlG2Up4bW9jDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"87ef7683aa9439ef3f3d814160da137d8cd6d21b821e2e30a4d6d7de8555b2b9","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:49.486379Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:49.486379Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero","submitted_at":"2018-10-31T16:21:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Over the past decade, national research evaluation exercises, traditionally conducted using the peer review method, have begun opening to bibliometric indicators. The citations received by a publication are assumed as proxy for its quality, but they require standardization prior to use in comparative evaluation of organizations or individual scientists: the citation data must be standardized, due to the varying citation behavior across research fields. The objective of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of the different methods of normalizing citations, in order to provide useful indic"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1810.13379","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1810.13379","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:49.486462+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1810.13379v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:49.486462+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1810.13379","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:49.486462+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Q7XXNA5KSQ46","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Q7XXNA5K","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q7XXNA5K"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Q7XXNA5K","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1810.13379&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Q7XXNA5KSQ466PZ5QFAWBWQTPW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:49.486462+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:49.486462+00:00"}