{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q","short_pith_number":"pith:QCL3FMJI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8097b2b128e3dfd1b8b14e01f2269fdc3732fe0f496a93d374f2b528fc23114f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1506.01315","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Impossibility Theorems and the Universal Algebraic Toolkit","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO","math.CO","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CC","authors_text":"Mario Szegedy, Yixin Xu","submitted_at":"2015-06-01T04:42:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"We elucidate a close connection between the Theory of Judgment Aggregation (more generally, Evaluation Aggregation), and a relatively young but rapidly growing field of universal algebra, that was primarily developed to investigate constraint satisfaction problems. Our connection yields a full classification of non-binary evaluations into possibility and impossibility domains both under the idempotent and the supportive conditions. Prior to the current result E. Dokow and R. Holzman nearly classified non-binary evaluations in the supportive case, by combinatorial means. The algebraic approach "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1506.01315","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CC","submitted_at":"2015-06-01T04:42:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO","math.CO","q-fin.EC"],"title_canon_sha256":"41aefabe608b6b7fd2ec96d545a1168b062013e6969ad6195f429fdb4e3abc24","abstract_canon_sha256":"1d167c95135c047cc2ad05c75f6038a2551dc03620145ff010b08465f0e9d5c8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:24.597444Z","signature_b64":"1BWjxd+aiGr+eFEG9gMzGX2H4SsknZG/vCOJqUnm1DQB9Yn0f37O++EOaWATpIlPgkBw4Kz5Zju8qQZ0BLK2Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8097b2b128e3dfd1b8b14e01f2269fdc3732fe0f496a93d374f2b528fc23114f","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:24.597065Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:24.597065Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Impossibility Theorems and the Universal Algebraic Toolkit","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO","math.CO","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CC","authors_text":"Mario Szegedy, Yixin Xu","submitted_at":"2015-06-01T04:42:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"We elucidate a close connection between the Theory of Judgment Aggregation (more generally, Evaluation Aggregation), and a relatively young but rapidly growing field of universal algebra, that was primarily developed to investigate constraint satisfaction problems. Our connection yields a full classification of non-binary evaluations into possibility and impossibility domains both under the idempotent and the supportive conditions. Prior to the current result E. Dokow and R. Holzman nearly classified non-binary evaluations in the supportive case, by combinatorial means. The algebraic approach "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1506.01315","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1506.01315","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:24.597124+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1506.01315v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:24.597124+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1506.01315","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:24.597124+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QCL3FMJI4PP5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFR","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QCL3FMJI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17136","citing_title":"Classification aggregation: a quantitative impossibility theorem","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17136","citing_title":"Classification aggregation: a quantitative impossibility theorem","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QCL3FMJI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QCL3FMJI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1506.01315&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QCL3FMJI4PP5DOFRJYA7EJU73Q/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:24.597124+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:24.597124+00:00"}