{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V","short_pith_number":"pith:QCWCURFV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"80ac2a44b555a7d6e02c17cb826353fd649cdd6d345d6cfe5c8cbfc43cb06f7b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2109.04457","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fundamental limits of quantum error mitigation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Mile Gu, Ryuji Takagi, Shintaro Minagawa, Suguru Endo","submitted_at":"2021-09-09T17:56:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"The inevitable accumulation of errors in near-future quantum devices represents a key obstacle in delivering practical quantum advantages, motivating the development of various quantum error-mitigation methods. Here, we derive fundamental bounds concerning how error-mitigation algorithms can reduce the computation error as a function of their sampling overhead. Our bounds place universal performance limits on a general error-mitigation protocol class. We use them to show (1) that the sampling overhead that ensures a certain computational accuracy for mitigating local depolarizing noise in laye"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2109.04457","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2021-09-09T17:56:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b89252584b9e965a325e84c5c5317060ace69e3554a4c4ca4a75ed98473708a5","abstract_canon_sha256":"0d00df9b02793c105006fba70a5859e2945e8a63638d3d6bbc8e7e7433ee19a8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.519350Z","signature_b64":"Vs4417bUI91FNbRkiGpnpOlFaw68P/ELbcGg4FWsb1kGRyrXVpbcrkLSv0YBEhYaaUQbEkQUvLwGP0aW5QRwCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"80ac2a44b555a7d6e02c17cb826353fd649cdd6d345d6cfe5c8cbfc43cb06f7b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518881Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518881Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fundamental limits of quantum error mitigation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Mile Gu, Ryuji Takagi, Shintaro Minagawa, Suguru Endo","submitted_at":"2021-09-09T17:56:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"The inevitable accumulation of errors in near-future quantum devices represents a key obstacle in delivering practical quantum advantages, motivating the development of various quantum error-mitigation methods. Here, we derive fundamental bounds concerning how error-mitigation algorithms can reduce the computation error as a function of their sampling overhead. Our bounds place universal performance limits on a general error-mitigation protocol class. We use them to show (1) that the sampling overhead that ensures a certain computational accuracy for mitigating local depolarizing noise in laye"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2109.04457","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2109.04457/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2109.04457","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2109.04457v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2109.04457","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QCWCURFVKWT5","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QCWCURFVKWT5NYBM","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QCWCURFV","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518939+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2211.08318","citing_title":"Quantum simulation of dynamical phase transitions in noisy quantum devices","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2306.02620","citing_title":"Feasibility of performing quantum chemistry calculations on quantum computers","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.10997","citing_title":"Reliable high-accuracy error mitigation for utility-scale quantum circuits","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27648","citing_title":"Effective Noise Mitigation via Quantum Circuit Learning in Quantum Simulation of Integrable Spin Chains","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QCWCURFV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QCWCURFV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2109.04457&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QCWCURFVKWT5NYBMC7FYEY2T7V/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518939+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:59:57.518939+00:00"}