{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL","short_pith_number":"pith:QE3ROBWK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"81371706cac408118960c9910635a492fadb14a48b8b530c9efeee1a923e0c72","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1501.04431","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck","submitted_at":"2015-01-19T09:31:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bibliometric studies often rely on field-normalized citation impact indicators in order to make comparisons between scientific fields. We discuss the connection between field normalization and the choice of a counting method for handling publications with multiple co-authors. Our focus is on the choice between full counting and fractional counting. Based on an extensive theoretical and empirical analysis, we argue that properly field-normalized results cannot be obtained when full counting is used. Fractional counting does provide results that are properly field normalized. We therefore recomm"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1501.04431","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2015-01-19T09:31:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0d5c915c2f2cf19c7d917706ff59bc07c3eda2170505120e76285f6735cb0ceb","abstract_canon_sha256":"2b5d9197f1123cf39f6c0f5a328d36abbaf065d8c1ebfb6d2b1228718d791e39"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:09.013923Z","signature_b64":"SW8IWbf/5rQt7c8XaR3kx06I91cH7gbq1hLInaKkiTIpnjhilQ8TwPiWo3C6wWKX7yP+7alThv/bzSk9ynOEAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"81371706cac408118960c9910635a492fadb14a48b8b530c9efeee1a923e0c72","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:09.013383Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:09.013383Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck","submitted_at":"2015-01-19T09:31:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bibliometric studies often rely on field-normalized citation impact indicators in order to make comparisons between scientific fields. We discuss the connection between field normalization and the choice of a counting method for handling publications with multiple co-authors. Our focus is on the choice between full counting and fractional counting. Based on an extensive theoretical and empirical analysis, we argue that properly field-normalized results cannot be obtained when full counting is used. Fractional counting does provide results that are properly field normalized. We therefore recomm"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1501.04431","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1501.04431","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:09.013470+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1501.04431v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:09.013470+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1501.04431","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:09.013470+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QE3ROBWKYQEB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QE3ROBWK","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:37.295048+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QE3ROBWK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QE3ROBWK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1501.04431&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QE3ROBWKYQEBDCLAZGIQMNNESL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:09.013470+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:09.013470+00:00"}