{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL","short_pith_number":"pith:QFHVMVMS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"814f565592828be45ef1c1a0dd634082c8a995d0f22e5792b4a73582ce3d3bcf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2204.03021","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Moral Integrity Corpus: A Benchmark for Ethical Dialogue Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Alon Halevy, Caleb Ziems, Diyi Yang, Jane A. Yu, Yi-Chia Wang","submitted_at":"2022-04-06T18:10:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Conversational agents have come increasingly closer to human competence in open-domain dialogue settings; however, such models can reflect insensitive, hurtful, or entirely incoherent viewpoints that erode a user's trust in the moral integrity of the system. Moral deviations are difficult to mitigate because moral judgments are not universal, and there may be multiple competing judgments that apply to a situation simultaneously. In this work, we introduce a new resource, not to authoritatively resolve moral ambiguities, but instead to facilitate systematic understanding of the intuitions, valu"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2204.03021","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-04-06T18:10:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"811b8504d565c9cec52943ca7aa4348a560aef3c25614abe0d7c10430b2d3cd0","abstract_canon_sha256":"90f61b8107ce96a4a5fc65fa2148f8c0d0296207bf1d1c89a18bf75a0d740bcc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011941Z","signature_b64":"YaejNCerVm1OB8kkwbcpKS0Rge0H5BiCIbGNYlfh8TzQAFcjV17WhyzwPA8EDfS9Big7eIzF57vJlo3U7VZPCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"814f565592828be45ef1c1a0dd634082c8a995d0f22e5792b4a73582ce3d3bcf","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011572Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011572Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Moral Integrity Corpus: A Benchmark for Ethical Dialogue Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Alon Halevy, Caleb Ziems, Diyi Yang, Jane A. Yu, Yi-Chia Wang","submitted_at":"2022-04-06T18:10:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Conversational agents have come increasingly closer to human competence in open-domain dialogue settings; however, such models can reflect insensitive, hurtful, or entirely incoherent viewpoints that erode a user's trust in the moral integrity of the system. Moral deviations are difficult to mitigate because moral judgments are not universal, and there may be multiple competing judgments that apply to a situation simultaneously. In this work, we introduce a new resource, not to authoritatively resolve moral ambiguities, but instead to facilitate systematic understanding of the intuitions, valu"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2204.03021","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2204.03021/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2204.03021","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011631+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2204.03021v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011631+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2204.03021","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011631+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QFHVMVMSQKF6","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011631+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXR","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011631+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QFHVMVMS","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011631+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.07071","citing_title":"Value Compass Benchmarks: A Platform for Fundamental and Validated Evaluation of LLMs Values","ref_index":85,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QFHVMVMS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QFHVMVMS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2204.03021&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QFHVMVMSQKF6IXXRYGQN2Y2AQL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011631+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:19.011631+00:00"}