{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV","short_pith_number":"pith:QIV347X4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"822bbe7efca67d57983e1ffc516de33d5da3e8039de03e471d9e9508424b2755","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.19125","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"TRACES: TEE-based Runtime Auditing for Commodity Embedded Systems","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Adam Caulfield, Antonio Joia Neto, Ivan De Oliveira Nunes, Norrathep Rattanavipanon","submitted_at":"2024-09-27T20:10:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Control Flow Attestation (CFA) offers a means to detect control flow hijacking attacks on remote devices, enabling verification of their runtime trustworthiness. CFA generates a trace (CFLog) containing the destination of all branching instructions executed. This allows a remote Verifier (Vrf) to inspect the execution control flow on a potentially compromised Prover (Prv) before trusting that a value/action was correctly produced/performed by Prv. However, while CFA can be used to detect runtime compromises, it cannot guarantee the eventual delivery of the execution evidence (CFLog) to Vrf. In"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.19125","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-09-27T20:10:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0efe1002d411d4bbda3275d68e5b0c33746ae10678e4b28a79a77f4efd729373","abstract_canon_sha256":"a5450b2fe635fd4f11fde04941a8d40fec90d7d11e644265b780eac60660b38c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955981Z","signature_b64":"9XN/cSNHRFsc0tNEPlgjmuuBTwHSrDUtc6lCzmTD5zLBonn6MhdOm7WLdBYXti6VDxwhaFEzTg+Et4MB4hscDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"822bbe7efca67d57983e1ffc516de33d5da3e8039de03e471d9e9508424b2755","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955495Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955495Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"TRACES: TEE-based Runtime Auditing for Commodity Embedded Systems","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Adam Caulfield, Antonio Joia Neto, Ivan De Oliveira Nunes, Norrathep Rattanavipanon","submitted_at":"2024-09-27T20:10:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Control Flow Attestation (CFA) offers a means to detect control flow hijacking attacks on remote devices, enabling verification of their runtime trustworthiness. CFA generates a trace (CFLog) containing the destination of all branching instructions executed. This allows a remote Verifier (Vrf) to inspect the execution control flow on a potentially compromised Prover (Prv) before trusting that a value/action was correctly produced/performed by Prv. However, while CFA can be used to detect runtime compromises, it cannot guarantee the eventual delivery of the execution evidence (CFLog) to Vrf. In"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.19125","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.19125/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.19125","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955552+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.19125v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955552+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.19125","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955552+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QIV347X4UZ6V","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955552+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955552+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QIV347X4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955552+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.14088","citing_title":"Resolving Availability and Run-time Integrity Conflicts in Real-Time Embedded Systems","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QIV347X4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QIV347X4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.19125&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QIV347X4UZ6VPGB6D76FC3PDHV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955552+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:10.955552+00:00"}