{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T","short_pith_number":"pith:QJZRR2UP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"827318ea8f155983f50b504cb605baf4e1a1cf9de9fa192fa7d4aac7644d5280","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2203.06703","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Valid and efficient imprecise-probabilistic inference with partial priors, I. First results","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Ryan Martin","submitted_at":"2022-03-13T16:36:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Between Bayesian and frequentist inference, it's commonly believed that the former is for cases where one has a prior and the latter is for cases where one has no prior. But the prior/no-prior classification isn't exhaustive, and most real-world applications fit somewhere in between these two extremes. That neither of the two dominant schools of thought are suited for these applications creates confusion and slows progress. A key observation here is that ``no prior information'' actually means no prior distribution can be ruled out, so the classically-frequentist context is best characterized "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2203.06703","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2022-03-13T16:36:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"14db4ffb07d675657cb34f9e0ca9200196f30e79a33ab79d9d0bdf54ec4ba8be","abstract_canon_sha256":"2ac83f63ad351a70fec0bf76a54f761917a99f91c64870319029fedc382b1f4e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.369275Z","signature_b64":"bWT4r1/kaAZkJVUHmOvTs9cIyQXzOgStRMINjfXznf0OFmDw1l7PrhPO5JDYYsWv9STQ3Rlrn7veKbaeyJ87BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"827318ea8f155983f50b504cb605baf4e1a1cf9de9fa192fa7d4aac7644d5280","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368774Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368774Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Valid and efficient imprecise-probabilistic inference with partial priors, I. First results","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Ryan Martin","submitted_at":"2022-03-13T16:36:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Between Bayesian and frequentist inference, it's commonly believed that the former is for cases where one has a prior and the latter is for cases where one has no prior. But the prior/no-prior classification isn't exhaustive, and most real-world applications fit somewhere in between these two extremes. That neither of the two dominant schools of thought are suited for these applications creates confusion and slows progress. A key observation here is that ``no prior information'' actually means no prior distribution can be ruled out, so the classically-frequentist context is best characterized "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2203.06703","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2203.06703/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2203.06703","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368834+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2203.06703v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368834+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2203.06703","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368834+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QJZRR2UPCVMY","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368834+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QJZRR2UPCVMYH5IL","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368834+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QJZRR2UP","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368834+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2410.01427","citing_title":"Regularized e-processes: anytime valid inference with knowledge-based efficiency gains","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.09007","citing_title":"Possibilistic inferential models: a review","ref_index":96,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QJZRR2UP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QJZRR2UP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2203.06703&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QJZRR2UPCVMYH5ILKBGLMBN26T/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368834+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:19:34.368834+00:00"}