{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM","short_pith_number":"pith:QKABYW7I","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"82801c5be8d9a31ac299622fe22db12335482f98e565fd8d9d46ec8e255843aa","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.12357","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Large Language Models for Code Analysis: Do LLMs Really Do Their Job?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Asmita, Chongzhou Fang, Han Wang, Houman Homayoun, Jialin Liu, Najmeh Nazari, Ning Miao, Ruijie Fang, Ruoyu Zhang, Ryan Tsang, Shaurya Srivastav","submitted_at":"2023-10-18T22:02:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in the realm of natural language understanding and programming code processing tasks. Their capacity to comprehend and generate human-like code has spurred research into harnessing LLMs for code analysis purposes. However, the existing body of literature falls short in delivering a systematic evaluation and assessment of LLMs' effectiveness in code analysis, particularly in the context of obfuscated code.\n  This paper seeks to bridge this gap by offering a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs' capabilities in performing code anal"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.12357","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2023-10-18T22:02:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CR"],"title_canon_sha256":"de1c50f1162906cdd18e9cae3090e668d4d1c7a0a3ac32337f25502225618897","abstract_canon_sha256":"126ba63a8d9698e3275f4a6f19a55124cc90848ca25c5587ec3e157c2755dbf2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200506Z","signature_b64":"wt9vDEXOf17UHEQAKbN04mpVjdY3tIVRPOETiporPV+ivQETLDqo17N6C9kuh2YeFPagw0+aLUnEQ1buK3bEBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"82801c5be8d9a31ac299622fe22db12335482f98e565fd8d9d46ec8e255843aa","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200009Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200009Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Large Language Models for Code Analysis: Do LLMs Really Do Their Job?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Asmita, Chongzhou Fang, Han Wang, Houman Homayoun, Jialin Liu, Najmeh Nazari, Ning Miao, Ruijie Fang, Ruoyu Zhang, Ryan Tsang, Shaurya Srivastav","submitted_at":"2023-10-18T22:02:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in the realm of natural language understanding and programming code processing tasks. Their capacity to comprehend and generate human-like code has spurred research into harnessing LLMs for code analysis purposes. However, the existing body of literature falls short in delivering a systematic evaluation and assessment of LLMs' effectiveness in code analysis, particularly in the context of obfuscated code.\n  This paper seeks to bridge this gap by offering a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs' capabilities in performing code anal"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.12357","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.12357/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.12357","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200068+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.12357v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200068+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.12357","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200068+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QKABYW7I3GRR","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200068+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200068+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QKABYW7I","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200068+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17535","citing_title":"AgentModernize: Preserving Business Logic in Legacy Modernization with Multi-Agent LLMs and Behavioral Specification Graphs","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QKABYW7I"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QKABYW7I","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.12357&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QKABYW7I3GRRVQUZMIX6ELNREM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200068+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:42.200068+00:00"}