{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2007:QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK","short_pith_number":"pith:QKZLYJK5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"82b2bc255d26b3e64d564392d21452b2b19bf60090cdf58c871b8844f2237328","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"quant-ph/0702262","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Faked states attack using detector efficiency mismatch on SARG04, phase-time, DPSK, and Ekert protocols","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Johannes Skaar, Vadim Makarov","submitted_at":"2007-02-27T22:56:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"In quantum cryptosystems, variations in detector efficiency can be exploited to stage a successful attack. This happens when the efficiencies of Bob's two detectors are different functions of a control parameter accessible to Eve (e.g., timing of the incoming pulses). It has previously been shown that the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol is vulnerable to this attack. In this paper, we show that several other protocols and encodings may also be vulnerable. We consider a faked states attack in the case of a partial efficiency mismatch on the Scarani-Acin-Ribordy-Gisin 2004 (SARG04) protocol"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0702262","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2007-02-27T22:56:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"497bcf19590ad4c44f1c85c860f0dffbc8e1f7f1d8ae7630af33f53f08338cf5","abstract_canon_sha256":"0db3399b03c6e539c63d619cb0630de4cbbfba71aedc2b85042490c1ce5e5e39"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464431Z","signature_b64":"KAZZKdHUomGz57eVKMcR0jgE7PPjwGS9K753kKjTKOiTzp0SrFALnj/TB9xj1AauVwG8heaFoDWXXlDqfF/CCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"82b2bc255d26b3e64d564392d21452b2b19bf60090cdf58c871b8844f2237328","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464034Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464034Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Faked states attack using detector efficiency mismatch on SARG04, phase-time, DPSK, and Ekert protocols","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Johannes Skaar, Vadim Makarov","submitted_at":"2007-02-27T22:56:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"In quantum cryptosystems, variations in detector efficiency can be exploited to stage a successful attack. This happens when the efficiencies of Bob's two detectors are different functions of a control parameter accessible to Eve (e.g., timing of the incoming pulses). It has previously been shown that the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol is vulnerable to this attack. In this paper, we show that several other protocols and encodings may also be vulnerable. We consider a faked states attack in the case of a partial efficiency mismatch on the Scarani-Acin-Ribordy-Gisin 2004 (SARG04) protocol"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0702262","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/quant-ph/0702262/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"quant-ph/0702262","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"quant-ph/0702262v3","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0702262","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QKZLYJK5E2Z6","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKW","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QKZLYJK5","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464099+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.14243","citing_title":"Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution: Protocols, Quantum Games, and Security","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QKZLYJK5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QKZLYJK5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=quant-ph/0702262&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QKZLYJK5E2Z6MTKWIOJNEFCSWK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464099+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:10:32.464099+00:00"}