{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS","short_pith_number":"pith:QN7G3HYA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"837e6d9f00826f1616ca0891bec38214a0cba270da498de9792ab3bc18a70e89","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.01825","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Improving Concept Alignment in Vision-Language Concept Bottleneck Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Adams Wai-Kin Kong, Alex Kot, Nithish Muthuchamy Selvaraj, Xiaobao Guo","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T03:02:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Concept Bottleneck Models (CBM) map images to human-interpretable concepts before making class predictions. Recent approaches automate CBM construction by prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate text concepts and employing Vision Language Models (VLMs) to score these concepts for CBM training. However, it is desired to build CBMs with concepts defined by human experts rather than LLM-generated ones to make them more trustworthy. In this work, we closely examine the faithfulness of VLM concept scores for such expert-defined concepts in domains like fine-grained bird species and anima"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.01825","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T03:02:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2ef6b9aa073ad4e58115c83f17f9fed2810f843399d8a6f82868b6102cf97001","abstract_canon_sha256":"14a6708154bcc394368e1094bd2a87a2eef6391b8263965587f3d89c88648180"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982738Z","signature_b64":"B3SR46aCF15CauvLNsyycs58IUx28TxObzWYS/rdHFQxSINW7sirPZUQ7IOmqRVqHjrpCzty+lDc2b7z1cGZDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"837e6d9f00826f1616ca0891bec38214a0cba270da498de9792ab3bc18a70e89","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982259Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982259Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Improving Concept Alignment in Vision-Language Concept Bottleneck Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Adams Wai-Kin Kong, Alex Kot, Nithish Muthuchamy Selvaraj, Xiaobao Guo","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T03:02:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Concept Bottleneck Models (CBM) map images to human-interpretable concepts before making class predictions. Recent approaches automate CBM construction by prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate text concepts and employing Vision Language Models (VLMs) to score these concepts for CBM training. However, it is desired to build CBMs with concepts defined by human experts rather than LLM-generated ones to make them more trustworthy. In this work, we closely examine the faithfulness of VLM concept scores for such expert-defined concepts in domains like fine-grained bird species and anima"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.01825","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.01825/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.01825","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982326+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.01825v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982326+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.01825","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982326+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QN7G3HYAQJXR","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982326+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWK","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982326+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QN7G3HYA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982326+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04326","citing_title":"Measuring What Matters: Synthetic Benchmarks for Concept Bottleneck Models","ref_index":75,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.09988","citing_title":"Engineering Resource-constrained Software Systems with DNN Components: a Concept-based Pruning Approach","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QN7G3HYA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QN7G3HYA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.01825&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QN7G3HYAQJXRMFWKBCI35Q4CCS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982326+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:43.982326+00:00"}