{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG","short_pith_number":"pith:QOPYB4OR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"839f80f1d1e9f3bf04b5a46558c972819ca40b367414885c44d42407d20d1446","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.13228","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conformal Prediction as Bayesian Quadrature","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Jake C. Snell, Thomas L. Griffiths","submitted_at":"2025-02-18T19:06:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"As machine learning-based prediction systems are increasingly used in high-stakes situations, it is important to understand how such predictive models will perform upon deployment. Distribution-free uncertainty quantification techniques such as conformal prediction provide guarantees about the loss black-box models will incur even when the details of the models are hidden. However, such methods are based on frequentist probability, which unduly limits their applicability. We revisit the central aspects of conformal prediction from a Bayesian perspective and thereby illuminate the shortcomings "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.13228","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-02-18T19:06:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"ac526f754972843065d7ccc8eb0c09b21e7b1d29cbb2eb4d7eebfee41e6d0971","abstract_canon_sha256":"8fad194214d7c1fbe49a73d114d2cdab5fd78240f4a322ff3c107cea0a5705c9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449549Z","signature_b64":"GxZK1YjmymULwy4BOsgCR/WXMuh7mqW0S1kyeDN8ac+oxowK974KOw6s8TXG2o7Rv97VXqJjVYoGfWP9CJr6CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"839f80f1d1e9f3bf04b5a46558c972819ca40b367414885c44d42407d20d1446","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449077Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449077Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conformal Prediction as Bayesian Quadrature","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Jake C. Snell, Thomas L. Griffiths","submitted_at":"2025-02-18T19:06:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"As machine learning-based prediction systems are increasingly used in high-stakes situations, it is important to understand how such predictive models will perform upon deployment. Distribution-free uncertainty quantification techniques such as conformal prediction provide guarantees about the loss black-box models will incur even when the details of the models are hidden. However, such methods are based on frequentist probability, which unduly limits their applicability. We revisit the central aspects of conformal prediction from a Bayesian perspective and thereby illuminate the shortcomings "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.13228","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.13228/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.13228","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449136+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.13228v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449136+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.13228","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449136+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QOPYB4OR5HZ3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449136+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449136+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QOPYB4OR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449136+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16616","citing_title":"MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QOPYB4OR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QOPYB4OR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.13228&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QOPYB4OR5HZ36BFVURSVRSLSQG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449136+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:51.449136+00:00"}