{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D","short_pith_number":"pith:QPZPDZQ5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"83f2f1e61d7f71903d2a20232dc2f3d0d7965ec6ab09ff27f4baad7b7bab222d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1610.07524","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Alexandra Chouldechova","submitted_at":"2016-10-24T18:23:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recidivism prediction instruments provide decision makers with an assessment of the likelihood that a criminal defendant will reoffend at a future point in time. While such instruments are gaining increasing popularity across the country, their use is attracting tremendous controversy. Much of the controversy concerns potential discriminatory bias in the risk assessments that are produced. This paper discusses a fairness criterion originating in the field of educational and psychological testing that has recently been applied to assess the fairness of recidivism prediction instruments. We demo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1610.07524","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2016-10-24T18:23:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"4825036dacf9d94ff7abf2e02cbd97d7054a7fb1ea1e54a1bdd150e8a47664a7","abstract_canon_sha256":"950aff68b564f66405e7fae6a06d6f5559388eb5ae93766bfca64c2bd76fcd23"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:01:29.896063Z","signature_b64":"zppYDuBkPTmrNm2Ntntbaj+5LBb1MgwH9fgc6jcK0vsZpsYTkgi1+vE573vdzsIbKMyX6Rpp5DbOJxIJ794UAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"83f2f1e61d7f71903d2a20232dc2f3d0d7965ec6ab09ff27f4baad7b7bab222d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:01:29.895595Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:01:29.895595Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Alexandra Chouldechova","submitted_at":"2016-10-24T18:23:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recidivism prediction instruments provide decision makers with an assessment of the likelihood that a criminal defendant will reoffend at a future point in time. While such instruments are gaining increasing popularity across the country, their use is attracting tremendous controversy. Much of the controversy concerns potential discriminatory bias in the risk assessments that are produced. This paper discusses a fairness criterion originating in the field of educational and psychological testing that has recently been applied to assess the fairness of recidivism prediction instruments. We demo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1610.07524","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1610.07524","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:01:29.895653+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1610.07524v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:01:29.895653+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1610.07524","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:01:29.895653+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QPZPDZQ5P5YZ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:41.710351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJK","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:41.710351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QPZPDZQ5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:41.710351+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12433","citing_title":"Marginal Alignment Does Not Guarantee Joint-Distribution Fidelity: An Official-Reference Audit of Nemotron-Personas-Korea with Cross-Locale Replication","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07628","citing_title":"Frankenstein in the Pipeline: Computational Epistemicide in Facial Recognition","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.09881","citing_title":"Toward Calibrated, Fair, and accurate Deepfake Detection","ref_index":177,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QPZPDZQ5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QPZPDZQ5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1610.07524&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QPZPDZQ5P5YZAPJKEARS3QXT2D/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:01:29.895653+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:01:29.895653+00:00"}