{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM","short_pith_number":"pith:QQCHIGZZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8404741b396a4287d8a87622169924a33d97a0300fdb426617d4622b4fcf934c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1812.10236","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparing Spatial Regression to Random Forests for Large Environmental Data Sets","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Anthony R. Olsen, Eric W. Fox, Jay M. Ver Hoef","submitted_at":"2018-12-26T05:55:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Environmental data may be \"large\" due to number of records, number of covariates, or both. Random forests has a reputation for good predictive performance when using many covariates with nonlinear relationships, whereas spatial regression, when using reduced rank methods, has a reputation for good predictive performance when using many records that are spatially autocorrelated. In this study, we compare these two techniques using a data set containing the macroinvertebrate multimetric index (MMI) at 1859 stream sites with over 200 landscape covariates. A primary application is mapping MMI pred"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1812.10236","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2018-12-26T05:55:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"10de2fc3c23f4818ec627431808cc4241819f6cea90d7b4f6db13bcfb52c89da","abstract_canon_sha256":"c268e7b7340334d7adcabba9f6c5ec21f5e4ceab49382baf23f9c4957146d18e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:24.708834Z","signature_b64":"7IzZCzs2ybiqCAYhoEnasdEOoViAxo4ZRxojXpzfOb/G9idu0NhIHtwlduviklRP12OWElyBY96dMhgz8YsSBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8404741b396a4287d8a87622169924a33d97a0300fdb426617d4622b4fcf934c","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:24.708253Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:24.708253Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparing Spatial Regression to Random Forests for Large Environmental Data Sets","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Anthony R. Olsen, Eric W. Fox, Jay M. Ver Hoef","submitted_at":"2018-12-26T05:55:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Environmental data may be \"large\" due to number of records, number of covariates, or both. Random forests has a reputation for good predictive performance when using many covariates with nonlinear relationships, whereas spatial regression, when using reduced rank methods, has a reputation for good predictive performance when using many records that are spatially autocorrelated. In this study, we compare these two techniques using a data set containing the macroinvertebrate multimetric index (MMI) at 1859 stream sites with over 200 landscape covariates. A primary application is mapping MMI pred"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1812.10236","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1812.10236","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:24.708332+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1812.10236v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:24.708332+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1812.10236","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:24.708332+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QQCHIGZZNJBI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QQCHIGZZ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QQCHIGZZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QQCHIGZZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1812.10236&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QQCHIGZZNJBIPWFIOYRBNGJEUM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:24.708332+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:24.708332+00:00"}