{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY","short_pith_number":"pith:QSXDHM4S","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"84ae33b39244000ff5e0b16ea3221316103000f77edaf001e135d17377963a98","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1905.01230","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The primordial black hole formation criterion re-examined: parameterisation, timing, and the choice of window function","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Sam Young","submitted_at":"2019-05-03T15:38:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper, the criterion used to determine whether a density perturbation will collapse to form a primordial black hole (PBH) is re-examined, in respect of its use to determine the abundance of PBHs. There is particular focus on which parameter to use, the time at which the abundance should be calculated, and the use of different smoothing functions. It is concluded that, with the tools currently available, the smoothed density contrast should be used rather than the peak value, and should be calculated from the time-independent component of the density contrast in the super-horizon limit "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1905.01230","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2019-05-03T15:38:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e353bc04bc27a64e1cc8f41d079ed4d694dd574af8e2fc64d664ffe148e2297c","abstract_canon_sha256":"7c4077d2a0d9dd9d150e294470bd870a95da98c13b98011a34db587221ea6072"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274550Z","signature_b64":"o7WjODTCEPlby2dCrMVkK+REgyhGINAXLhJ5yf6EvwOmKCUjdH/Ty93jabTF6D3LkA8A7OIljT4htrUvquHYCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"84ae33b39244000ff5e0b16ea3221316103000f77edaf001e135d17377963a98","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274148Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274148Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The primordial black hole formation criterion re-examined: parameterisation, timing, and the choice of window function","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Sam Young","submitted_at":"2019-05-03T15:38:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper, the criterion used to determine whether a density perturbation will collapse to form a primordial black hole (PBH) is re-examined, in respect of its use to determine the abundance of PBHs. There is particular focus on which parameter to use, the time at which the abundance should be calculated, and the use of different smoothing functions. It is concluded that, with the tools currently available, the smoothed density contrast should be used rather than the peak value, and should be calculated from the time-independent component of the density contrast in the super-horizon limit "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1905.01230","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1905.01230/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1905.01230","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274204+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1905.01230v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274204+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1905.01230","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274204+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QSXDHM4SIQAA","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274204+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QSXDHM4SIQAA75PA","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274204+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QSXDHM4S","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274204+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30340","citing_title":"Carr criterion and mass gaps in non-singular primordial black hole formation","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22789","citing_title":"Primordial black holes in excursion set theory: Formation probabilities, mass functions, and window functions","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27496","citing_title":"Primordial black hole dark matter from axion inflation","ref_index":76,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QSXDHM4S"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QSXDHM4S","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1905.01230&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QSXDHM4SIQAA75PAWFXKGIQTCY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274204+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:26:35.274204+00:00"}