{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6","short_pith_number":"pith:QU5ODULH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"853ae1d167231bb118bdb5f1eb64b5b7b63360589dfe904a56eabd3a73449118","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2007.12922","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Data fusion methods for the heterogeneity of treatment effect and confounding function","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Donglin Zeng, Shu Yang, Siyi Liu, Xiaofei Wang","submitted_at":"2020-07-25T12:57:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"The heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) lies at the heart of precision medicine. Randomized controlled trials are gold-standard for treatment effect estimation but are typically underpowered for heterogeneous effects. In contrast, large observational studies have high predictive power but are often confounded due to the lack of randomization of treatment. We show that an observational study, even subject to hidden confounding, may be used to empower trials in estimating the HTE using the notion of confounding function. The confounding function summarizes the impact of unmeasured confounder"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2007.12922","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2020-07-25T12:57:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0471e18e03d1027d8a4f3ceb4046423d6b6a9c1a8f5042f2d9a45bb676c491fc","abstract_canon_sha256":"39db373cc04b8e9879d1eb1f2e5c76b3fcffb5801044f060285e01ac84ef11cc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322933Z","signature_b64":"pm06jvu+bWPckbR+LgjMlVDApID+51yRGq1mrQ5ryapHY+qIgw4k34rQmpX46Ofco+hhTWXJhH9HV59fDOAbDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"853ae1d167231bb118bdb5f1eb64b5b7b63360589dfe904a56eabd3a73449118","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322438Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322438Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Data fusion methods for the heterogeneity of treatment effect and confounding function","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Donglin Zeng, Shu Yang, Siyi Liu, Xiaofei Wang","submitted_at":"2020-07-25T12:57:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"The heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) lies at the heart of precision medicine. Randomized controlled trials are gold-standard for treatment effect estimation but are typically underpowered for heterogeneous effects. In contrast, large observational studies have high predictive power but are often confounded due to the lack of randomization of treatment. We show that an observational study, even subject to hidden confounding, may be used to empower trials in estimating the HTE using the notion of confounding function. The confounding function summarizes the impact of unmeasured confounder"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2007.12922","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2007.12922/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2007.12922","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2007.12922v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.12922","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QU5ODULHEMN3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QU5ODULH","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322496+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08981","citing_title":"Divide-and-shrink: An efficient and heterogeneity-agnostic approach for transfer estimation using summary statistics","ref_index":69,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00350","citing_title":"Robust Estimation and Inference with Selective Borrowing in Hybrid Controlled Trials: A Tutorial with SelectiveIntegrative and intFRT","ref_index":71,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2404.18905","citing_title":"Detecting critical treatment effect bias in small subgroups","ref_index":56,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2410.02941","citing_title":"Efficient collaborative learning of the average treatment effect","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20710","citing_title":"Assessing Estimate of CATE from Observational Data via an RCT Study","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QU5ODULH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QU5ODULH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2007.12922&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QU5ODULHEMN3CGF5WXY6WZFVW6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322496+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:54.322496+00:00"}