{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2","short_pith_number":"pith:QU6JKT4D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"853c954f8352d012ac57710ff7b369669693dc7f361cec9ff65acc083007aa97","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1812.11813","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Aldo Gangemi, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese, Francesco Poggi, Paolo Ciancarini, Silvio Peroni, Valentina Presutti","submitted_at":"2018-12-31T14:37:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Alternative metrics (aka altmetrics) are gaining increasing interest in the scientometrics community as they can capture both the volume and quality of attention that a research work receives online. Nevertheless, there is limited knowledge about their effectiveness as a mean for measuring the impact of research if compared to traditional citation-based indicators. This work aims at rigorously investigating if any correlation exists among indicators, either traditional (i.e. citation count and h-index) or alternative (i.e. altmetrics) and which of them may be effective for evaluating scholars."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1812.11813","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2018-12-31T14:37:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d42fedd9eba5bf11f3c00060c5ea2f7803970d6502e521e92656cf08563c6ae4","abstract_canon_sha256":"82fa576fd6528c80eee2b6be49e83f7e027b270e321de4e362c05cafb3ef53c1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:11.101939Z","signature_b64":"hTBgF/fw5gND9dkSa78QxCG7KdRa30dz8jSNOMPC/MJfh4pSr/vhKlxZ0PEyJTcLcmRvPUFMrTFrYFtgEOUMDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"853c954f8352d012ac57710ff7b369669693dc7f361cec9ff65acc083007aa97","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:11.101551Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:11.101551Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Aldo Gangemi, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese, Francesco Poggi, Paolo Ciancarini, Silvio Peroni, Valentina Presutti","submitted_at":"2018-12-31T14:37:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Alternative metrics (aka altmetrics) are gaining increasing interest in the scientometrics community as they can capture both the volume and quality of attention that a research work receives online. Nevertheless, there is limited knowledge about their effectiveness as a mean for measuring the impact of research if compared to traditional citation-based indicators. This work aims at rigorously investigating if any correlation exists among indicators, either traditional (i.e. citation count and h-index) or alternative (i.e. altmetrics) and which of them may be effective for evaluating scholars."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1812.11813","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1812.11813","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:11.101612+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1812.11813v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:11.101612+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1812.11813","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:11.101612+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QU6JKT4DKLIB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QU6JKT4D","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:46.962924+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00235","citing_title":"Bilinear formalism for Schwarzian KP and Harry Dym hierarchies","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QU6JKT4D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QU6JKT4D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1812.11813&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QU6JKT4DKLIBFLCXOEH7PM3JM2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:11.101612+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:57:11.101612+00:00"}