{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA","short_pith_number":"pith:QWFD4TSL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"858a3e4e4b4a994b3595e86cd0fc02182063db201f5ce85360c14515cddd3373","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1803.03672","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Competitive Machine Learning: Best Theoretical Prediction vs Optimization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Amin Khajehnejad, Shima Hajimirza","submitted_at":"2018-03-09T19:42:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning is often used in competitive scenarios: Participants learn and fit static models, and those models compete in a shared platform. The common assumption is that in order to win a competition one has to have the best predictive model, i.e., the model with the smallest out-sample error. Is that necessarily true? Does the best theoretical predictive model for a target always yield the best reward in a competition? If not, can one take the best model and purposefully change it into a theoretically inferior model which in practice results in a higher competitive edge? How does that m"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1803.03672","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2018-03-09T19:42:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"5bed8e7610ae26523e6fb2c58634f7e9372021fe828ff28356b5c93cd89e2bd3","abstract_canon_sha256":"8e78164cdcff6b771260e925a795273252403c3fb00c45a3146bf203232e2be3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:19.336739Z","signature_b64":"TpwvAZsD651atEFmh4E0fL42aOKA5NkQ8Yi32Jb4KIRZssmU0Mgx1FCfLAuPV8tRvRnKXGiDrnDnZDl06V4sAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"858a3e4e4b4a994b3595e86cd0fc02182063db201f5ce85360c14515cddd3373","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:19.336248Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:19.336248Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Competitive Machine Learning: Best Theoretical Prediction vs Optimization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Amin Khajehnejad, Shima Hajimirza","submitted_at":"2018-03-09T19:42:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning is often used in competitive scenarios: Participants learn and fit static models, and those models compete in a shared platform. The common assumption is that in order to win a competition one has to have the best predictive model, i.e., the model with the smallest out-sample error. Is that necessarily true? Does the best theoretical predictive model for a target always yield the best reward in a competition? If not, can one take the best model and purposefully change it into a theoretically inferior model which in practice results in a higher competitive edge? How does that m"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1803.03672","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1803.03672","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:19.336313+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1803.03672v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:19.336313+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1803.03672","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:19.336313+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QWFD4TSLJKMU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:50.500415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:50.500415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QWFD4TSL","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:50.500415+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QWFD4TSL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QWFD4TSL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1803.03672&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QWFD4TSLJKMUWNMV5BWNB7ACDA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:19.336313+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:19.336313+00:00"}