{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX","short_pith_number":"pith:QYAXL646","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"860175fb9e6e156a99e9ead102f18a95fff9fb0899ab8dff5f0d64c147a3200c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.00242","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Classical variational phase-field models cannot predict fracture nucleation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math-ph","math.MP"],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.mtrl-sci","authors_text":"Christopher J. Larsen, Gilles A. Francfort, John E. Dolbow, Oscar Lopez-Pamies","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T20:26:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Notwithstanding the evidence against them, classical variational phase-field models continue to be used and pursued in an attempt to describe fracture nucleation in elastic brittle materials. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the existing evidence against such a class of models as descriptors of fracture nucleation. To that end, a review is first given of the plethora of experimental observations of fracture nucleation in nominally elastic brittle materials under quasi-static loading conditions, as well as of classical variational phase-f"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.00242","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cond-mat.mtrl-sci","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T20:26:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math-ph","math.MP"],"title_canon_sha256":"efdbcdc668bb103de9cec52984a05bbb4b69382b11c06c9e9107a9f096bf7531","abstract_canon_sha256":"08c63df4814cc050d830bac57d8c4817b7e13ef75a471881d4ac632378823f0d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.317373Z","signature_b64":"OdxmuLdD0/IxIOEiyyUrjP+d/3WE5nmPG8zqMxpqMDbatZJZAl351KnXTdhnGVueiK0t9rhiWLroBvASkEacAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"860175fb9e6e156a99e9ead102f18a95fff9fb0899ab8dff5f0d64c147a3200c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316882Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316882Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Classical variational phase-field models cannot predict fracture nucleation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math-ph","math.MP"],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.mtrl-sci","authors_text":"Christopher J. Larsen, Gilles A. Francfort, John E. Dolbow, Oscar Lopez-Pamies","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T20:26:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Notwithstanding the evidence against them, classical variational phase-field models continue to be used and pursued in an attempt to describe fracture nucleation in elastic brittle materials. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the existing evidence against such a class of models as descriptors of fracture nucleation. To that end, a review is first given of the plethora of experimental observations of fracture nucleation in nominally elastic brittle materials under quasi-static loading conditions, as well as of classical variational phase-f"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.00242","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.00242/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.00242","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.00242v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.00242","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QYAXL646NYKW","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316939+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QYAXL646","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316939+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.22072","citing_title":"Phase-field modelling of cohesive fracture. Part III: From mathematical results to engineering application","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QYAXL646"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QYAXL646","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.00242&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QYAXL646NYKWVGPJ5LIQF4MKSX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316939+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:44.316939+00:00"}