{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3","short_pith_number":"pith:QYERFLK3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"860912ad5b4a4be9ff42514b93958366f264f4249d995c40bf139ab3826a9c5a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.05870","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Machine Against the RAG: Jamming Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Blocker Documents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Avital Shafran, Roei Schuster, Vitaly Shmatikov","submitted_at":"2024-06-09T17:55:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems respond to queries by retrieving relevant documents from a knowledge database and applying an LLM to the retrieved documents. We demonstrate that RAG systems that operate on databases with untrusted content are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks we call jamming. An adversary can add a single ``blocker'' document to the database that will be retrieved in response to a specific query and result in the RAG system not answering this query, ostensibly because it lacks relevant information or because the answer is unsafe.\n  We describe and measure th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.05870","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-06-09T17:55:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"7dad215b9cff79661f1bb53681e6ad5d3c39280cdf54ce425bbf70d59c0b332c","abstract_canon_sha256":"4111beac039e377e735378770ba78b2b7c4557a0c6fd5e5ffa8a7f31472b7ae7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.126632Z","signature_b64":"QJXfIUstOD0wb0xAEb4UdbIBCm9kmwxjeFSGg3IB5mLWl2MnTbZO+CMR5oI40AuVYbqBZ1eFQrnstCR9HuAgBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"860912ad5b4a4be9ff42514b93958366f264f4249d995c40bf139ab3826a9c5a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125825Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125825Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Machine Against the RAG: Jamming Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Blocker Documents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Avital Shafran, Roei Schuster, Vitaly Shmatikov","submitted_at":"2024-06-09T17:55:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems respond to queries by retrieving relevant documents from a knowledge database and applying an LLM to the retrieved documents. We demonstrate that RAG systems that operate on databases with untrusted content are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks we call jamming. An adversary can add a single ``blocker'' document to the database that will be retrieved in response to a specific query and result in the RAG system not answering this query, ostensibly because it lacks relevant information or because the answer is unsafe.\n  We describe and measure th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.05870","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.05870/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.05870","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.05870v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.05870","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QYERFLK3JJF6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QYERFLK3JJF6T72C","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QYERFLK3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125945+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00012","citing_title":"PRA-RAG: Provably Robust Aggregation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation against Retrieval Corruption","ref_index":121,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27157","citing_title":"Detecting Is Not Resolving: The Monitoring Control Gap in Retrieval Augmented LLMs","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.20472","citing_title":"Robustness via Referencing: Defending against Prompt Injection Attacks by Referencing the Executed Instruction","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.11548","citing_title":"One Shot Dominance: Knowledge Poisoning Attack on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QYERFLK3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QYERFLK3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.05870&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QYERFLK3JJF6T72CKFFZHFMDM3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125945+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:27:11.125945+00:00"}