{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX","short_pith_number":"pith:QYZMVJT2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8632caa67a1853931776b118693f3d25ea4920a60014656205141e016a6fac04","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.18102","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"InspireDebate: Multi-Dimensional Subjective-Objective Evaluation-Guided Reasoning and Optimization for Debating","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Changjun Jiang, Fuyu Wang, Jiangtong Li, Kun Zhu","submitted_at":"2025-06-22T17:14:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the rapid advancements in large language models (LLMs), debating tasks, such as argument quality assessment and debate process simulation, have made significant progress. However, existing LLM-based debating systems focus on responding to specific arguments while neglecting objective assessments such as authenticity and logical validity. Furthermore, these systems lack a structured approach to optimize across various dimensions$-$including evaluation metrics, chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, and multi-turn debate refinement$-$thereby limiting their effectiveness. To address these interco"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.18102","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-22T17:14:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0c8475500b5d631af91aeb8e7ecdc305dc2cb9c066f5febda36c7f8f3aa35ce4","abstract_canon_sha256":"4e11ce00d57a3f1aeccaf8918fc670b72255fda93c6edfe845faf035cde89683"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566947Z","signature_b64":"Wg+eveZFtV2/yZ8I+wyLGh6UlyIO3DI/N1DiEfWXZpeklduZJ+CX2ksg9k/PSgH/9Wc8xip04cNbWnSY2MQ3CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8632caa67a1853931776b118693f3d25ea4920a60014656205141e016a6fac04","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566518Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566518Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"InspireDebate: Multi-Dimensional Subjective-Objective Evaluation-Guided Reasoning and Optimization for Debating","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Changjun Jiang, Fuyu Wang, Jiangtong Li, Kun Zhu","submitted_at":"2025-06-22T17:14:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the rapid advancements in large language models (LLMs), debating tasks, such as argument quality assessment and debate process simulation, have made significant progress. However, existing LLM-based debating systems focus on responding to specific arguments while neglecting objective assessments such as authenticity and logical validity. Furthermore, these systems lack a structured approach to optimize across various dimensions$-$including evaluation metrics, chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, and multi-turn debate refinement$-$thereby limiting their effectiveness. To address these interco"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.18102","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.18102/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.18102","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.18102v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.18102","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QYZMVJT2DBJZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3W","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QYZMVJT2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566575+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07226","citing_title":"DEFINED: A Data-Efficient Computational Framework for Fine-Grained Creativity Assessment in Debate Scenarios","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QYZMVJT2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QYZMVJT2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.18102&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QYZMVJT2DBJZGF3WWEMGSPZ5EX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566575+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:28.566575+00:00"}