{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW","short_pith_number":"pith:QZ7WYK2T","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"867f6c2b5316badb5416312dcf028ec591f3a65be93f82db73bf9fca0877fb6d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1806.00035","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recall","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Mario Lucic, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Olivier Bachem, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly","submitted_at":"2018-05-31T18:14:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in generative modeling have led to an increased interest in the study of statistical divergences as means of model comparison. Commonly used evaluation methods, such as the Frechet Inception Distance (FID), correlate well with the perceived quality of samples and are sensitive to mode dropping. However, these metrics are unable to distinguish between different failure cases since they only yield one-dimensional scores. We propose a novel definition of precision and recall for distributions which disentangles the divergence into two separate dimensions. The proposed notion is in"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1806.00035","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2018-05-31T18:14:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"1fbd918f54cc4acd41def06363ca050be4dd51be9569997a838d2835a2da77c0","abstract_canon_sha256":"915e719b7e45a62acf60f3c1081c56af137e6265d0e4960be888915dfd53454d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:09.837462Z","signature_b64":"jXdRJ/Vj5gkdPOrsQKYK2FcQvCCwJY8mThQ6RQH2ibIbYZhfTC+ZB5HQrGWd8XWngJb+PeKv/qUt0c+yWlM7Cg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"867f6c2b5316badb5416312dcf028ec591f3a65be93f82db73bf9fca0877fb6d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:09.836833Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:09.836833Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recall","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Mario Lucic, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Olivier Bachem, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly","submitted_at":"2018-05-31T18:14:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in generative modeling have led to an increased interest in the study of statistical divergences as means of model comparison. Commonly used evaluation methods, such as the Frechet Inception Distance (FID), correlate well with the perceived quality of samples and are sensitive to mode dropping. However, these metrics are unable to distinguish between different failure cases since they only yield one-dimensional scores. We propose a novel definition of precision and recall for distributions which disentangles the divergence into two separate dimensions. The proposed notion is in"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1806.00035","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1806.00035","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:09.836959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1806.00035v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:09.836959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1806.00035","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:09.836959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"QZ7WYK2TC25N","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:50.500415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:50.500415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"QZ7WYK2T","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:50.500415+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00195","citing_title":"Diversity in Large Language Models under Supervised Fine-Tuning","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00195","citing_title":"Diversity in Large Language Models under Supervised Fine-Tuning","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QZ7WYK2T"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/QZ7WYK2T","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1806.00035&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/QZ7WYK2TC25NWVAWGEW46AUOYW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:09.836959+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:09.836959+00:00"}