{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4","short_pith_number":"pith:R3GZN52N","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8ecd96f74d960a108812edb98310796710db7b32eb0935956ecca4a3a8ee2f00","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.06790","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Large-scale moral machine experiment on large language models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Kazuhiro Takemoto, Muhammad Shahrul Zaim bin Ahmad","submitted_at":"2024-11-11T08:36:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their potential integration into autonomous driving systems necessitates understanding their moral decision-making capabilities. While our previous study examined four prominent LLMs using the Moral Machine experimental framework, the dynamic landscape of LLM development demands a more comprehensive analysis. Here, we evaluate moral judgments across 52 different LLMs, including multiple versions of proprietary models (GPT, Claude, Gemini) and open-source alternatives (Llama, Gemma), to assess their alignment with human moral preferences"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.06790","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-11-11T08:36:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"2c73ff0f09f0ffe0fd37a07f2aacd21c55c6bc28b934265297e5fb152ca82c2f","abstract_canon_sha256":"741f8740fbc38543d8c24fc4352727df1ac35445bcfe3264a6cfb4a1644aae9c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.464478Z","signature_b64":"B5ZJWbZilcqVKbfOH0md/bypa82fCZQYwluEaStzklpHwy4gB4yS2vC7a9y5ohmCXE9DIurXIaW1XlfMbe+JAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8ecd96f74d960a108812edb98310796710db7b32eb0935956ecca4a3a8ee2f00","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463916Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463916Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Large-scale moral machine experiment on large language models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Kazuhiro Takemoto, Muhammad Shahrul Zaim bin Ahmad","submitted_at":"2024-11-11T08:36:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their potential integration into autonomous driving systems necessitates understanding their moral decision-making capabilities. While our previous study examined four prominent LLMs using the Moral Machine experimental framework, the dynamic landscape of LLM development demands a more comprehensive analysis. Here, we evaluate moral judgments across 52 different LLMs, including multiple versions of proprietary models (GPT, Claude, Gemini) and open-source alternatives (Llama, Gemma), to assess their alignment with human moral preferences"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.06790","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.06790/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.06790","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463974+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.06790v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463974+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.06790","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463974+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"R3GZN52NSYFB","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463974+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463974+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"R3GZN52N","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463974+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.20312","citing_title":"Let's Get You Hired: A Job Seeker's Perspective on Multi-Agent Recruitment Systems for Explaining Hiring Decisions","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/R3GZN52N"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/R3GZN52N","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.06790&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/R3GZN52NSYFBBCAS5W4YGEDZM4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463974+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:16.463974+00:00"}