{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX","short_pith_number":"pith:R43K73KJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8f36afed491eff86d2e7f9c91f0f219dfe8af39b5cb36e71262d36829920554f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2104.06737","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Natural-Language Multi-Agent Simulations of Argumentative Opinion Dynamics","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.MA","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Gregor Betz","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T09:45:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper develops a natural-language agent-based model of argumentation (ABMA). Its artificial deliberative agents (ADAs) are constructed with the help of so-called neural language models recently developed in AI and computational linguistics. ADAs are equipped with a minimalist belief system and may generate and submit novel contributions to a conversation. The natural-language ABMA allows us to simulate collective deliberation in English, i.e. with arguments, reasons, and claims themselves -- rather than with their mathematical representations (as in formal models). This paper uses the nat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2104.06737","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T09:45:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.MA","cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"86161ad2517da81248932981f64f0a98abb50c1681a0ace3ca3cfffb0bbfa259","abstract_canon_sha256":"ce2ac1cbaff4a0ca2c0b0cbce11e6978312a780d77b902aa76400e82ed9ad4ce"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545761Z","signature_b64":"9wJ2YY3O1IlB9qG5yB2nX8ysPfebDMJx6EDUdG9ZjPYZBTcp16wrNQis+67NmqFtYL6GSTIVMqDAWRuMxlJ/Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8f36afed491eff86d2e7f9c91f0f219dfe8af39b5cb36e71262d36829920554f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545364Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545364Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Natural-Language Multi-Agent Simulations of Argumentative Opinion Dynamics","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.MA","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Gregor Betz","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T09:45:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper develops a natural-language agent-based model of argumentation (ABMA). Its artificial deliberative agents (ADAs) are constructed with the help of so-called neural language models recently developed in AI and computational linguistics. ADAs are equipped with a minimalist belief system and may generate and submit novel contributions to a conversation. The natural-language ABMA allows us to simulate collective deliberation in English, i.e. with arguments, reasons, and claims themselves -- rather than with their mathematical representations (as in formal models). This paper uses the nat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2104.06737","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2104.06737/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2104.06737","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2104.06737v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2104.06737","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"R43K73KJD37Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"R43K73KJD37YNUXH","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"R43K73KJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545422+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.06858","citing_title":"Disentangling Interaction and Bias Effects in Opinion Dynamics of Large Language Models","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/R43K73KJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/R43K73KJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2104.06737&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/R43K73KJD37YNUXH7HER6DZBTX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545422+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:06.545422+00:00"}